On 03/28/2012 02:52 PM, antonio.ro...@deimos.com.pt wrote:
A few minutes after your message, Markus Mets sent another
message in disagreement with this.
Any other inputs?
Yes, I should check better, before shooting off wrong answers!
Sorry for misleading.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:49:10 +0200, Micha Silver
<mi...@arava.co.il> wrote:
On 03/28/2012 02:06 PM, antonio.ro...@deimos.com.pt
wrote:
Greetings
Daniel lee suggested me that the problem might be the
defined region. But, as far as I know, Defined region has no
impact over importing data. This is true right?
AFAIK, not quite true. Vector data are imported "whole" with
no regard to the region. But raster imports honour the current
region. So only that part of the imported raster covered by
the current region is imported.
Furthermore the module r.in.gdal has a flag '-e' to reset the
current region to the extents of the imported data, and thus
importing the whole dataset.
Thanks
Antonio
Am 27. März 2012 11:52 schrieb António Rocha <antonio.ro...@deimos.com.pt>:
Greetings
I have imported a Raster image in GRASS 6.4.1 with r.in.gdal
and now, when I import the same raster (with 6.4.2) there is
a grid mistmatch (more or less a quarter pixel) from
previous import to the current import. The image is the
same, the Location/Mapset also the only difference is the
update of GRASS. Is this expected?
Thanks
Antonio
This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
|
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user