Minimum wxPython version is changed in r55466 (I hope I haven't missed any other places).
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Pietro <peter.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Newcomb, Doug <doug_newc...@fws.gov> wrote: >> By at least, do you mean looking at 2.6, 2.7 or 3.0 as well? > > +1 for python 2.6 that it is the default version in debian stable [0]... > > > Moreover, the Python 2.6 [1] added compatibility functions in a > future_builtins module and a -3 switch to warn about usages that will > become unsupported in 3.0... > Therefore if we require python2.6, we can start to think about > cleaning the python code and start to use the "future_builtins" > modules. Yes, python3 is probably inevitable so we should prepare for it. > > Concerning GRASS and python 3.X, I think that the biggest problem is > the WxPython, at the moment only the develop version Phoneix[2] it is > working with python 3. I think a lot of other projects are in the same situation so I hope Phoenix will become more stable soon. It will take some time to update wxGUI to work with it but in theory there shouldn't be any major problems. A lot of small problems will appear, often because some parts of the gui code is a mess (usually some gui layout parts) and the newer wxPython doesn't accept it. So any other opinions on Python version? Anna _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user