Hi Michael, On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> wrote: > My understanding is that Python 3 is not backward compatible with Python 2.
it is true, but we are not talking to require python3 instead of python2, we are talking to require python2.6 instead of python2.4, that it is not backward compatible. Changing python2.4 in python2.6 allow us to start preparing the code to reduce the gap between python2 and python3. Therefore if one day in the 2016 or later (may be for GRASS8), we decide to switch definitely to python3 we should be able to switch without too much effort. Pietro _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user