For what is worth, same applies for Greece, split in two zones. I performed the whatsoever processings separately. Merged results later, according to wanted output spatial reference system.
Nikos À mar. mars 28 09:07:47 2017 GMT+0200, Blumentrath, Stefan a écrit : > Hi Bülent, > > Here in Norway we face the same situation. The country covers UTM zones 31 to > 36. However, the standard the public authorities suggest is to use the > average (UTM 33) when running analysis on the whole country. > Of course this leads to imprecision and distortion, but if that is > significant or not depends on your application (esp. scale of the problem you > are going to solve)… > > Since GRASS has a topological vector format, linking external vector data can > cause issues in your analysis, esp. with polygons. However, points can be > fine in many cases… Please have a look at the mauals of v.external [1] and > v.external.out [2]. > > Cheers, > Stefan > > 1: https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/manuals/v.external.html > 2: https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/manuals/v.external.out.html > > -- Sent from mobile _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
