On 18/12/17 16:35, Stefan Blumentrath wrote:
Hi Moritz,

Thanks for helping with troubleshooting!
QUANTIFICATION_VALUE is 10000, Thus dividing with it gives a maximum value of 
2.8...
Any idea how to figure out if it is 12 or 16 bit image. It is directly 
downloaded from ESA...

Check which proportion of the image is > 1. AFAIR (which is a bit limited), you might have reflectances above 1 in saturated pixels. I just checked on a random image and I also have some pixels above 1, but only 0.25% of the pixels:

GRASS 7.5.svn (UTM32N):/data/home/mlennert > r.mapcalc "test = if(b04_refl>1,1,0)"
 100%
GRASS 7.5.svn (UTM32N):/data/home/mlennert > r.stats -cp test
 100%
0 120259106 99.75%
1 301294 0.25%

And all the pixels with value 1 are in clouded areas.

Moritz


Cheers
Stefan

-----Original Message-----
From: grass-user [mailto:grass-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of 
Moritz Lennert
Sent: mandag 18. desember 2017 16.26
To: Žofie Cimburová <zoficimbur...@gmail.com>
Cc: GRASS user list <grass-user@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] i.atcorr with Sentinel2

On 18/12/17 16:13, Žofie Cimburová wrote:
Dear Moritz,

According to
https://earth.esa.int/web/sentinel/user-guides/sentinel-2-msi/product-
types , the L1C product I am using already is in top of atmosphere
reflectance, so this should not be the problem (?).
I tried running i.atcorr both with and without the -r flag.

Reflectance is the percentage of light that is reflected either from the top of 
the atmosphere or from the surface. Reflectance values should thus be real 
values between 0 and 1. Your data have

Range of data:    min = 1  max = 28000

This means that they are expressed in digital (integer) numbers. Try 
transforming these DN into real numbers. IIRC, in the metadata, you have a 
variable QUANTIFICATION_VALUE. Divide your pixel values by that value to get 
real TOA reflectance values.

AFAIK, it also depends on whether you directly imported the original 12-bit 
file, or possibly a modified, e.g. 16-bit, version.

Moritz

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Moritz Lennert
<mlenn...@club.worldonline.be <mailto:mlenn...@club.worldonline.be>> wrote:

     On 18/12/17 13:14, Žofie Cimburová wrote:

         Hi all,
         Now the 6S parameters are complete, but the output map contains
         only NULLs, no matter what combinations of input parameters and
         flags I use. Have anyone encountered the same issue? (Info
below.)


     In the i.atcorr man page it says:

     "If flag -r is used, the input raster data are treated as
     reflectance. Otherwise, the input raster data are treated as
     radiance values"

     IIUC, your data is still in DN. You might want to try to transform
     this into radiance values before sending it into i.atcorr.

     Moritz


         Thanks again.
         Zofie

         ----------------------------------------
         Version:
         g.version -g
         version=7.4.0RC1
         date=2017
         revision=exported
         build_date=2017-11-18
         build_platform=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
         build_off_t_size=8

         ----------------------------------------
         Region:
         g.region -p
         projection: 1 (UTM)
         zone:       33
         datum:      etrs89
         ellipsoid:  grs80
         north:      6653695
         south:      6643685
         west:       256495
         east:       266505
         nsres:      10
         ewres:      10
         rows:       1001
         cols:       1001
         cells:      1002001

         ----------------------------------------
         Input data: Sentinel2 L1C product B02 (tried with B01 too)
         r.info <http://r.info> <http://r.info>
         map=test_B02@p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo
            
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
            | Map:      test_B02@p_Sentinel4Nat  Date: Wed Dec  6
         12:06:39 2017
            | Mapset:   p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo      Login of Creator:
         stefan.blumentr
            | Location: ETRS_33N
            | DataBase: /data/grass
            | Title:
         S2A_OPER_PRD_MSIL1C_PDMC_20160907T044118_R008_V20160905T104022_2
            | Timestamp: none
            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
            |
            |   Type of Map:  raster               Number of Categories: 0
            |   Data Type:    CELL
            |   Rows:         1001
            |   Columns:      1001
            |   Total Cells:  1002001
            |        Projection: UTM (zone 33)
            |            N:    6653695    S:    6643685   Res:    10
            |            E:     266505    W:     256495   Res:    10
            |   Range of data:    min = 1  max = 28000
            |
            |   Data Description:
            |    generated by r.in.gdal
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
-------+

         ----------------------------------------
         6s file:
         25- geometrical conditions=Sentinel-2A
         9 5 10.6728 10.73413 59.90647- month day hh.ddd longitude latitude
         4 - atmospheric model=subarctic summer
         3- aerosol model=urban
         50- visibility [km] (aerosol model concentration) (this is
         estimated, I also tried with AOD specified)
         -0.055- mean target elevation above sea level [km]
         -1000- sensor height
         166- Sentinel2A Blue band B2 (440nm - 535nm)

         ----------------------------------------
         Command:
         i.atcorr input=test_B02@p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo range=1,28000
         elevation=dem_10m_25833@p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo
         parameters=/home/NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt
         <http://NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt>
         <http://NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt
         <http://NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt>>
         output=test_B02_atcorr
           >Atmospheric correction...
           >Atmospheric correction complete.

         (I am not sure about the range parameter, tried with 0,255 too.
         The DEM contains no NULLs. Also tried running with -r and -a
flags.)

         ----------------------------------------
         Output:
         r.info <http://r.info> <http://r.info>
         map=test_B02_atcorr@p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo
            
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
            | Map:      test_B02_atcorr@p_Sentinel4N  Date: Mon Dec 18
         13:10:14 2017
            | Mapset:   p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo      Login of Creator:
         zofie.cimburova
            | Location: ETRS_33N
            | DataBase: /data/grass
            | Title:    test_B02_atcorr2
            | Timestamp: none
            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
            |
            |   Type of Map:  raster               Number of Categories: 0
            |   Data Type:    FCELL
            |   Rows:         1001
            |   Columns:      1001
            |   Total Cells:  1002001
            |        Projection: UTM (zone 33)
            |            N:    6653695    S:    6643685   Res:    10
            |            E:     266505    W:     256495   Res:    10
            |   Range of data:    min = -nan  max = -nan
            |
            |   Data Description:
            |    generated by i.atcorr
            |
            |   Comments:
            |    i.atcorr input="test_B02@p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo"
         range=1,28\
            |    000 elevation="dem_10m_25833@p_Sentinel4Nature_S2_Oslo"
         para\
            |
         meters="/home/NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt 
<http://NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt>
         <http://NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt
         <http://NINA.NO/zofie.cimburova/Sentinel4Nature/DATA/6s.txt>>" o\
            |    utput="test_B02_atcorr2" rescale=0,255
            |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
-------+



         On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Žofie Cimburová
         <zoficimbur...@gmail.com <mailto:zoficimbur...@gmail.com>
         <mailto:zoficimbur...@gmail.com
         <mailto:zoficimbur...@gmail.com>>> wrote:

              Dear Markus,
              thanks for your reply, this is exactly what I need to know!

              Best, Zofie

              On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Markus Neteler
         <nete...@osgeo.org <mailto:nete...@osgeo.org>
              <mailto:nete...@osgeo.org <mailto:nete...@osgeo.org>>> wrote:


                  On Dec 15, 2017 3:54 PM, "Žofie Cimburová"
                  <zoficimbur...@gmail.com
         <mailto:zoficimbur...@gmail.com> <mailto:zoficimbur...@gmail.com
         <mailto:zoficimbur...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
                  >
                  > Dear all,
                  > I am trying to use i.atcorr (GRASS 7.4) to apply
         atmospheric corrections for Sentinel 2 data. The documentation
         provides a great help, but there are two points I am not sure
         about -         >
                  > - I don't need the atmospheric correction to be
         applied to the whole scene, so I only imported a small clip of
         the scene to GRASS. What longitude and latitude shall I then
         specify in the 6S parameters?

                  I'd use the center coordinates of the clipped area.

                  > Or is it necessary to apply the corrections to the
         entire scene?

                  No since it is a pixel based algorithm.

                  > - How can I estimate the value of visibility (aerosol
         model concentration)?
                  There are AERONET data online somewhere which might be
         the best
                  choice.

                  Markus





         _______________________________________________
         grass-user mailing list
         grass-user@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:grass-user@lists.osgeo.org>
         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
         <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user>






_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user



_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to