Hi Scott, thanks for posting this. (I couldn't find the mov though). We don't know yet what to do with Grasshopper when it reaches one- point-oh. It seems that nobody really wants to sell it (we'd all prefer if it remained a free plugin), but that is not a guarantee. It's actually surprisingly expensive to sell anything; shipping, printing, required support, legalities, and so on and so forth.
-- David Rutten Robert McNeel & Associates On Sep 18, 9:50 pm, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have learned a lot by looking at the works of others that have been > posted on this site so I would like to hopefully contribute to this > collective knowledge. > > I once generated a curvilinear space frame within Sketchup which > proved to be rather difficult. I next found a way of making the same > space frame through the use of Rhino and Paracloud which was a little > easier but became rigid after the transition from Rhino to Paracloud. > Recently I was able to create the entire space frame within > Grasshopper and have found it simple to apply this space frame to any > shape. > > Most of the division values, subset lists, and cull patterns were > referenced to each other but there are still some places where they > are direct inputs through a slider, making it necessary to update > these values if the others are change. I posted the grasshopper > definition (triangularSPFR.wrm) as well as an animation of the process > of building the definition (triangularSPFR.mov). > > Regards, > Scott > Seattle, WA > > MCNEEL- I thought I saw it mentioned in a post once that Grasshopper > might be sold eventually? Please don't, it's going great so far.
