Thanks Brent, but the decomposing is not working.

I managed (I think is through evaulation of the subsurfaces, but I'm
not 1005 sure) to get the normal vector at the desired point.

The next question is...¿is it posible to subdivide the surface in
direct relation to the circle radius?

What I'm trying to acomplish is not panelling with a determinate form
that adapts to a surface but to panellate with a determinate panel of
a fixed size (fixed for each case not for each u,v point) that adapts
in number and rotation to the surface.

Here is the second attempt.

http://groups.google.com/group/grasshopper3d/web/PSEUDO%20PANELLING%2001.jpg

http://groups.google.com/group/grasshopper3d/web/M_diagrid_2.ghx


Thanks to all!!

On 26 nov, 21:40, BrentWatanabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/grasshopper3d/web/M_diagrid_PLANAR.ghx
>
> You need to make sure you set your vector direction correctly.  So if
> you want your circle to be "on plane"  you need to set the normal
> direction of the circle equal to the Z- vector of the planes.  There
> might be an easier way to do it, but by decomposing the plane to its
> vectors it gets you what you want...I think.
>
> Brent
>
> On Nov 26, 2:12 pm, Arquitextonica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All!
>
> > I've been trying to panel a surface through subdivision. Not really
> > panel but to accomodate a polygon or circle in the center of a
> > subdivision. My problem is that I can't manage to align the circle
> > normal with the normal to the frame that i have been able to place
> > correctly.
>
> > I placed the frame at the center of the subdivision thorugh a
> > secondary subdivision and a Cull Pattern, There should be another more
> > efficient way, isn't there?
>
> > Thanks to all for the good effort! GH is a really powerful tool for
> > designers and architects alike!
>
> > Here you can see the GHX.
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/grasshopper3d/web/M_diagrid.ghx
>
> > BTW, A diagrid means a diagonal grid doesn't it? So what I'm
> > constructin shouldn't be called a diagrid...my english is horrible...

Reply via email to