Thanks for the encouragement. Comparing Grasshopper to GC - For what I was doing I found grasshopper better by far. Admittedly I'm much more comfortable in Rhino than in Microstation, but even taking that into account, GH just feels far more intuitive and clear. The only thing I really missed from GC was being able to define custom components, but it looks like thats on its way.
On Feb 22, 6:08 pm, Mary <[email protected]> wrote: > wow -- this is fantastic -- you also did it in generative components? > Which method did you prefer, or, which program gave you the degree of > control that you wanted? > > mary > > On Feb 22, 12:09 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Beautiful! > > > -- > > David Rutten > > [email protected] > > Robert McNeel & Associates > > > On Feb 22, 1:00 pm, Dan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I've been playing around a bit with spatial linkages and mechanisms in > > > grasshopper, and thought I'd share if anyones interested : > > > >http://spacesymmetrystructure.wordpress.com/2009/02/21/grasshopperrhi... > > > > You can download the .ghx there for an adjustable bennett linkage. > > > I've found Grasshopper really makes exploring this stuff a lot easier. > > > Thanks!
