Thanks David. Is there an ETA for the next release of GH? What about Rhino 5?
On Mar 10, 8:36 am, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > Just save them as gh or ghx files using your current version. > Grasshopper 0.5 and earlier will load wrm and save as ghx. We'll keep > an old version of Grasshopper around in case you run into more wrm > files that need converting, but this will become a time and effort > intensive process once 0.6 hits the shelves. > > My previous comment about the file not working wasn't an IO problem. > Old gh and ghx files should read fine (if they don't, I'll fix it). > The comment was about them working differently. The data matching > logic has changed so you may have to tweak old files before they > behave as before. > > -- > David Rutten > [email protected] > Robert McNeel & Associates > > On Mar 10, 3:30 pm, baldino <[email protected]> wrote: > > > uh, good to know > > > you said in a previous post that our actual ghx definitions might not > > work correctly in the next GH version... > > will you implement a "compatibility mode" or something... > > or will it be possible to install the new gh along with the older > > version ? > > > On Mar 10, 2:56 pm, opposablethumbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Is there an easy way to convert a bunch of files? > > > If not no big deal. > > > > thanks. > > > > David Rutten wrote: > > > > The next version of Grasshopper will no longer support the *.wrm file > > > > format. If you still have wrm files you should convert them now into > > > > either *.gh or *.ghx. > > > > > Support for this file format was intrinsic to many different > > > > interfaces and classes and in the interest of simplicity I decided to > > > > remove legacy IO code from the core plugin. > > > > > -- > > > > David Rutten > > > > [email protected] > > > > Robert McNeel & Associates
