Hi Alan, there's no Reason as such. It's just the way it's designed. This behaviour is not set in stone, we may well change it in upcoming versions.
For now, what you have to remember is that whenever *multiple* output values are the result of a *single* input value, there will be an additional dimension to the output path. I picked this option because it works under all circumstances and there are no special cases. The down-side is that it often results in paths that have more dimensions than strictly needed. -- David Rutten [email protected] Robert McNeel & Associates On Mar 22, 10:27 pm, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: > http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/series.jpg?hl=en&gda=8P9hSD... > When I created a series, it was assigned to path {0;0}. > I was expecting to see path {0}, which was the path after I flattened > it. > Is there a particular reason for this? > > Alan
