Just reminding you that you are selective in being intolerent!1
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: geedha geedha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 1, 2007 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: {greenyouth} Re: who speaks
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ys i know it before i started writing in it. not enough with gossips ? geedha On 10/1/07, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Geedha, > > "its true that madhyamam had stood for the cause of downtrodden > /marginalized sections of the society unlike most of the conventional > weeklies. And it is publishing my articles " > > Do you know that Madhyamam as an organisation have the policy that they > won't take women as workers? > > How will you reract to it? Will you stop writing in it? > [ Please don't do so out of polemical anger!!] > > > > > On 9/29/07, geedha geedha <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > dileep, > > > > first and foremost i must again remind u that the arguments which u > > asked me to explain are only a supportive ones to my main content which u > > still not ready to confront > > > > and about cover story published by madhyamam. i personally feel that it > > did not defame sughathakumari but had some accusations which were true-( > > vithura girl was taken to ravisankar, vithura girl was prevented from > > representing to change the advocate /reconsideration of the case ) .in > > madhyamam after geetha's article was published, sugathakumari herself got > > enough place to clarify. u had space to post ur argument and geetha's > > edited reply was published and my response was not published . > > > > its true that madhyamam had stood for the cause of downtrodden > > /marginalized sections of the society unlike most of the conventional > > weeklies. And it is publishing my articles . > > the point is that those who does not wound the brahmanical psyche will > > get ample space where the real issues are not addressed. > > recently in bashaposhini, when paul zakria wrote only two lines about > > sugathakumari in an article about the so called 'kerala renaissance' all > > the brahmanical /upper caste /cultural /literary intelligentia protested > > .remember an interview done by u with nisar ahmed where he termed the hug of > > amrithanandamayei as a cultural revolution .........its the space . and > > where is the space for the financial/tsunami/human god/brahmanical > > hindutwa aspect of amrithananthamayi and the suicide/drop out- of tribal > > children in attapady who stayed in amrithavidhyalayams . > > > > geedha > > > > > > > > -- Dileep R I thuravoor --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
