I still have the basic question Whats Communism? Please provide me a bibliography
On 23/04/2008, JAYARAJAN. C.N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dear ahmed, > You said: Patronise people struggles for party > aspirations. > Yes. You are right. Those who are worried in this are > only rightist forces whatever be their labels. > You may feel 'communism' or 'marxism' or 'leninism' are > cliche. No problem. Because, you are not communist. > But it is basic foundations of a communist party. > When I say cpim is not a communist party, it does not mean > that its cadres are not communist aspirants. > cheers, > appunni > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:17 PM, ahmed rafeek j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > it is not based on any kind of 'hatred' peeople here defend the attack > > of the cpim's insult and atrocities on people's struggles. party's > > brutal ground level voilence on people is shamefully justified by its > > red intellectuals. > > > > telling them that they are not real communist is the right response? > > > > nobody here seems to be having any kind of 'apartheid' to the > > communists. but it seems to be high time to realize that the cliches > > like new democratic revolutions, incorporation to the axis for a grand > > revolution, objectivve conditions and all have hitherto been used to > > patronize the people struggles for party (excuse me, but all communist > > parties) aspirations. > > > > Ahmed > > > > > > > > > > On 4/23/08, Bobby Kunhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > simple question > > > what is communism > > > would like to be educated on that > > > > > > > > > On 23/04/2008, JAYARAJAN. C.N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > dear friend, > > > > You are asking so many questions which both you > > and me > > > can not answer. More over, you are not expecting a reply as those > > questions > > > are reserved with your answers. > > > > Let me repeat. CPI(M) does not represent a > > communist > > > party. Every rightist forces know this well. So they are utilising > > this to > > > attack communist parties. > > > > Chengara struggle may be conducted with or > > without the > > > leadership of a communist party. On the other hand, a communist party > > shall > > > uphold the slogan ' land for tiller' and their new democratic > > revolutionary > > > movements shall incorporate that slogan as its main axis. This should > > be the > > > strategy of a communist party as the objective condtions in India like > > > countries are accordingly. > > > > Therefore, a communist party should support all > > land > > > struggles like 'Chengara' and should lead it if necessary. > > > > cheers, > > > > appunni > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:39 PM, ahmed rafeek j < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > communist parties ?!!!! > > > > > > > > > > please advise why people at struggle in Chengara need a communist > > party. > > > > > > > > > > does anybody need to symbolize cpim as communist party? what does > > make > > > > > a communist party really a communist party? what are the signs of > > > > > 'purity'? is there any single communist party which doesnt say > > that > > > > > they are the 'original'? why do we need to run after each > > communist > > > > > party to test whether it is real or no? what kind of great > > revolution > > > > > u r planning to do and in which century? > > > > > > > > > > Ahmed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/23/08, JAYARAJAN. C.N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > It is a usual tactics of rightist forces and rightist > > > medias by > > > > > > symbolising CPI(M) as a real communist party, exposing that > > party and > > > > > > generalising that communist parties are like this. > > > > > > It is unfortunate that even many progressive thinking > > people > > > are > > > > > > also repeating the same blah blahs. > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > appunni > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:03 AM, ranju radha < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > oho...now it s clear comrade > > > > > > > it s to save the world from US imperialism that those bloody > > CPM > > > cadres > > > > > > raped and killed Dalits in Nandigram .. > > > > > > > and damn those women cadres of CPM, who asked "what was that > > dalit > > > woman > > > > > > doing in the field at 4am" (where else will she shit? and what > > were > > > comrades > > > > > > doing in the field? reading communist manifesto?!!) > > > > > > > what a great revolutionary act comrades!!!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/22/08, ahmed rafeek j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > feel sorry for him... > > > > > > > > but good that he broke his silence at least in chintha. it > > was a > > > bit > > > > > > > > suspensful for me when i see many responses to him and some > > even > > > > > > > > requested for his response on Chengara and some threatened > > with > > > > > > > > spaaaaaaaam mails. > > > > > > > > but he just repeated what pinarayi n all said proving that > > all of > > > them > > > > > > > > are really 'red'. as k.k.koch rightly said, communism is as > > > dangerous > > > > > > > > as fascism to the indigenous people around the world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahmed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/22/08, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In an article in Chinta weekly GPramachandran (2008 > > April 18) > > > > > > > > > justifies CPIM's abti democratic standpoints/ actions on > > Tibet, > > > > > > Nandigram, > > > > > > > > > Chengara and Arayamkudi. He alleges that there are > > 'objective' > > > > > > evidences for > > > > > > > > > America's interventions > > > > > > > > > in Kerala. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nandigram and chengara are being manipulated by certain > > forces > > > to > > > > > > thwart > > > > > > > > > wider unity > > > > > > > > > formed aginst USimperialism, globalisation,communalisation > > and > > > > > > > > > fascism.(p.23) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Nandigram and Kolkotta, certain forces are 'depicting' > > CPIM > > > as > > > > > > enemy and > > > > > > > > > unleashing > > > > > > > > > attacks by siding with Congress, BJP, Thrunamool, Maoists > > and > > > Islamic > > > > > > > > > Fundamentalists (pp24--25) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He concludes the article by stating that " we should take > > it > > > seriously > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > anti communists are able to > > > > > > > > > create a group political hysteria around nandigram issue." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Dileep R I thuravoor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Bobby Kunhu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Bobby Kunhu --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
