Received from another group.

Sukla

http://biblelight.net/darwin.htm
*Pope John Paul II Declares Evolution to be Fact!*
------------------------------

Pope John Paul II, on the 23rd of October, 1996, while speaking to the
Pontifical Academy of Sciences plenary session at the Vatican, declared the
evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin to be fact, tacitly acknowledging
that man evolved from the apes, and reducing the biblical account of
Genesis to that of mere fable!

*TO ACADEMICIANS: TRUTH CANNOT CONTRADICT TRUTH*
VATICAN CITY, OCT 23, 1996 (VIS) - In a Message made public today to the
members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, meeting this week in the
Vatican in plenary session, the Holy Father recalled that Pope Pius XI, who
restored this academy in 1936, called this group of scholars "the Church's
'scientific senate'" and asked them "to serve the truth."
The Pope expressed delight on the plenary's theme on the origin of life and
evolution, "a basic theme which greatly interests the Church, as Revelation
contains, for its part, teachings concerning the nature and origins of
man." If the scientifically-reached conclusions and those contained in
Revelation on the origin of life seem to counter each other, he said, "in
what direction should we seek their solution? We know in effect that truth
cannot contradict truth."
John Paul II, noting the academy's "reflection on science at the dawn of
the third millennium," observed that "in the
domain<http://biblelight.net/darwin.htm#>of inanimate and animate
nature, the evolution of science and its
applications make new questions arise. The Church can grasp their
scope<http://biblelight.net/darwin.htm#>all the better as she knows
their basic aspects."
He pointed to the Church's magisterium on the question of the origin of
life and evolution, citing in particular Pius XII's 1950 Encyclical "Humani
Generis" and the conciliar Constitution "Gaudium et Spes."
The Pope drew the academicians' attention to "the need for a correct
interpretation of the inspired word, of a rigorous hermeneutics. It is
fitting to set forth well the limits of the meaning proper to Scripture,
rejecting undue interpretations which make it say what it does not have the
intention of saying."
"'Humani Generis'," he stated, "considered the doctrine of 'evolutionism'
as a serious hypothesis, worthy of a more deeply studied investigation and
reflection on a par with the opposite hypothesis. ... Today, more than a
half century after this encyclical, new knowledge leads us to recognize in
the theory of evolution more than a hypothesis. ... The convergence,
neither sought nor induced, of results of work done independently one from
the other, constitutes in itself a significant argument in favor of this
theory."
He continued: "The elaboration of a theory such as that of evolution, while
obeying the exigency of homogeneity with the data of observation, borrows
certain ideas from the philosophy of nature. To tell the truth, more than
the theory of evolution, one must speak of the theories of evolution. ...
There are thus materialistic and reductionist readings and spiritual
readings."
"The magisterium of the Church is directly interested in the question of
evolution because this touches upon the concept of man, ... created in the
image and likeness of God. ... Pius XII underlined this essential point:
'if the origin of the human body is sought in living matter which existed
before it, the spiritual soul is directly created by God.' Consequently,
the theories of evolution which, as a result of the philosophies which
inspire them, consider the spirit as emerging from forces of living matter
or as a simple epiphenomenon of this matter, are incompatible with the
truth about man. They are moreover incapable of laying the foundation for
the dignity of the person."
"Consideration of the method used in diverse orders of knowledge allows for
the concordance of two points of view
<http://biblelight.net/darwin.htm#>which seem irreconcilable. The
sciences of observation describe and measure
with ever greater precision the multiple manifestations of life and place
them on a timeline. The moment of passing over to the spiritual is not the
object of an observation of this type, which can nevertheless reveal, on an
experimental level, a series of very useful signs about the specificity of
the human being. But the experience of metaphysical knowledge, of the
awareness of self and of its reflexive nature, that of the moral
conscience, that of liberty, or still yet the aesthetic and religious
experience, are within the competence of philosophical analysis and
reflection, while theology extracts from it the final meaning according to
the Creator's designs."

*MESS/ORIGIN LIFE:EVOLUTION/ACAD VIS 961023 (660) *

The * Full Text of John Paul II's comments on evolution
<http://www.newadvent.org/docs/jp02tc.htm> *online at New Advent, a Roman
Catholic web page. (Note that my comments below are keyed to the original
official Vatican press release shown above, not this apparently complete
translation of the Pope's remarks, which were delivered in French.)

I will address just a few key quotes of John Paul II that were mentioned in
the above October 23rd, 1996 Vatican Information Service press release,
(article N.182).
To begin with, in the second paragraph, two sources of "truth" are
mentioned, one being the conclusions of modern science, and the other being
Revelation of truth from scripture or the church. The Pope stated that
"We know in effect that the truth cannot contradict the truth."
(This is a quote from * PROVIDENTISSIMUS DEUS
<http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/L13PROVI.htm>*, Paragraph 23).
What the Pope has done, as you will see, is elevate Darwinian evolutionary
theory to that of undeniable scientific fact, or truth. He then draws the
conclusion that since evolution is indeed the truth, the Catholic Church's
interpretation of the biblical account of Genesis cannot contradict this
now proven and accepted fact of evolution, and so church teachings must
consequently be re-evaluated and amended. The Catholic church has faced
this sort of predicament before.
The Pope probably sees parallels between Darwin's theory and the
astronomical discoveries of Galileo. In 1632, as a result of his scientific
observations, Galileo published a book in which he defended the Copernican
theory of a sun-centered solar system. Galileo's "Dialogue on the Great
World Systems" was swiftly condemned by Pope Urban VIII, because the church
believed and taught that the earth was the center of the universe. Galileo
was made to recant his heretical opinions and his book was banned by the
church for two-hundred years. It is a classic example of church dogma
suppressing scientific truth.
Here is a Catholic view of * The Galileo Affair
<http://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/GALILEO.TXT> *online at EWTN.
Recently (1979) the Pontifical Academy of Sciences reconsidered the Galileo
matter, with Pope John Paul II then acknowledging that the church erred in
it's condemning the factual astronomical discoveries of Galileo. So the
Pope probably saw a similar fiasco brewing between biblical creationism and
evolutionary science. While the astronomical sciences have proved beyond a
shadow of a doubt that the earth does indeed revolve around the Sun, the
case for evolutionary science has never been proven to be anything but
hypothesis, which is to say it is nothing more than speculation. The cases
are really quite different, but apparently that is not the opinion of John
Paul II.
In the 5th paragraph of the Vatican press release, the Pope points out-

"the need for a correct interpretation of the inspired word, of a rigorous
hermeneutics. It is fitting to set forth well the limits of the meaning
proper to scripture, rejecting undue interpretations which make it say what
it does not have the intention of saying."

The Pope is saying that he is abandoning what he feels is an untenable and
"undue" interpretation of the Bible, namely that God created the entire
universe, to include man, in a mere 6 days, and he is adopting instead the
process of Darwinian evolution which proposes man evolved over millions of
years from the apes.
Note with care what is stated in the 6th paragraph of the Vatican press
release. Pope John Paul II says-

" new knowledge leads us to recognize in the theory of evolution more than
a hypothesis."

Either evolution is theory (hypothesis) or it is fact, there is no middle
ground with respect to the origin of man. Either God created man directly
from the dust of the earth or He didn't. It is just that simple. *The Pope
in the above sentence has just declared evolution to be a fact, and in the
process he dismissed the biblical account of Genesis as fable.*
In the 6th paragraph of the above Vatican press release, an encyclical from
Pope Pius XII, HUMANI GENERIS, is summarized and appealed to for support by
John Paul II -

"Humani Generis'," he stated, "considered the doctrine of 'evolutionism' as
a serious hypothesis, worthy of a more deeply studied investigation and
reflection on a par with the opposite hypothesis." (He is commenting on
paragraph 36 of the encyclical)

In this summary of Humani Generis, John Paul II has just reduced the
biblical six day creation (the opposite hypothesis) to mere theory, and
elevated evolutionary science to be on a par with it as an equal
possibility to be considered! And that is indeed a correct assessment of
what Pius XII said in his encyclical.
Continuing, in the 8th paragraph of the Vatican press release, John Paul II
now quotes the encyclical * HUMANI GENERIS
<http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/P12HUMAN.htm> * (see paragraph 36) -

"if the origin of the human body is sought in living matter which existed
before it, the spiritual soul is directly created by God."

So, as Pius XII explains it, if man did evolve, the same is not true of the
soul. That, he claims, God created directly and put into man. Man himself
though, is presumed to have evolved from "pre-existing living matter",
rather than being created by God in one day from the dust of the earth.
What Pius XII meant by that is that man evolved from the apes in accord
with Darwinian theory!
What a predicament!! What an embarrassment for Christianity! At a time when
the Protestant church in America is fighting to re-introduce the teaching
of creationism into the public schools, Pope John Paul II stuns the world
and declares Darwin was right after all, and man *has* descended from the
apes! He is dismissing Genesis as fable and actually accepting Darwin's
Origin of the Species as fact! Absolutely amazing!

1 Tim 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, * avoiding
profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:*
1 Tim 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith.

------------------------------
Should you wish to do some further investigating, here are the documents
that are referred to by the Pope in his remarks. They are available online
at -
* HUMANI GENERIS <http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/P12HUMAN.htm> *- The
Encyclical of Pope Pius XII Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to
Undermine the Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, August 12, 1950.
* GAUDIUM ET SPES <http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/V2MODWOR.htm> *-
The Pastoral Constitution On the Church in the Modern World, Promulgated by
His Holiness, Pope Paul VI on December 7, 1965.
* PROVIDENTISSIMUS DEUS <http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/L13PROVI.htm> *-
Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII on the Study of Holy Scripture, November 18,
1893. (See paragraph #23 in particular)
------------------------------
In addition, here is a tract called * Adam, Eve and Evolution
<http://catholic.com/library/adam_eve_and_evolution.asp> *online at
Catholic Answers, that further explains the Catholic acceptance of
Darwinian evolution. Take special note of the 11th paragraph:

Concerning human evolution, the Church has a more definite teaching. It
allows for the possibility that man's body developed from previous
biological forms (under God's guidance), but it insists on the special
creation of his soul.

------------------------------
* The complete article is available from Time Magazine
<http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101961104-134926,00.html>.*
------------------------------
*The Great Translation Debate*
Something of a debate is swirling around what the Pope actually said, or
meant to say.
The contested passage is quoted here-

Today, almost half a century after the publication of the encyclical, new
knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more
than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory has been
progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in
various fields of knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor
fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted independently is in
itself a significant argument in favor of this theory.

The debate is whether or not the Pope said "the theory of evolution as more
than *a* hypothesis" or "the theory of evolution as more than
*one*hypothesis". The original French text of the crucial sentence is
presented
at the New Advent site listed near the top for those who understand it.
Some Catholics are scrambling to interpret the Pope's remarks to say that
he was merely acknowledging multiple theories of evolution, hence the "more
than * one* hypothesis". However, in context, the Pope is quite clear in
his endorsement of evolution as fact. Let me repeat his statement with my
notations-

Today, almost half a century after the publication of the encyclical, new
knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution [singular
theory] as more than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory
[of evolution, singular theory] has been progressively accepted by
researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of
knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor fabricated, of the results
of work that was conducted independently is in itself *a significant
argument in favor of this theory *[of evolution, singular theory].

The context of the paragraph clearly proposes that various fields of
scientific knowledge are converging in support of Darwinian evolution as
the mechanism of creation, and the Pope recognizes this convergence of
scientific evidence to significantly favor evolution, such that he at
least, no longer considers evolution to be just a hypothesis, but rather he
accepts it to be fact.
See also-
*Evolution: What the Pope Said
<http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/whatsaid.htm> *by James Aiken, at
Nazareth Resource Library.
It would seem that Catholics would rather debate this among themselves,
leaving the issue unresolved, rather than ask the Pope for clarification on
the issue. Perhaps they feel it is better if he simply remains silent
rather than explain and potentially exacerbate the problem by removing all
doubt about what he really meant to say.
------------------------------
*UPDATE <http://uk-mg5.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=a3q6me4mmgp9m>:*
*Pope Benedict XVI:*
" ... My predecessors Pope Pius XII and Pope John Paul II noted that there
is no opposition between faith’s understanding of creation and the evidence
of the empirical sciences. ..."
*Source: ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI  TO MEMBERS OF THE PONTIFICAL
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ON THE OCCASION OF THEIR PLENARY ASSEMBLY, Clementine
Hall, Friday, 31 October 2008.
<http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2008/october/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20081031_academy-sciences_en.html>*
*Evolution appears to be a reality favored by many scientific proofs.*
... Currently, I see in Germany, but also in the United States, a somewhat
fierce debate raging between so-called "creationism" and evolutionism,
presented as though they were mutually exclusive alternatives: those who
believe in the Creator would not be able to conceive of evolution, and
those who instead support evolution would have to exclude God. This
antithesis is absurd because, on the one hand, there are so many scientific
proofs in favour of evolution which appears to be a reality we can see and
which enriches our knowledge of life and being as such. But on the other,
the doctrine of evolution does not answer every query, especially the great
philosophical question: where does everything come from? And how did
everything start which ultimately led to man? I believe this is of the
utmost importance. ...
*Source: MEETING OF THE HOLY FATHER BENEDICT XVI WITH THE CLERGY OF THE
DIOCESES OF BELLUNO-FELTRE AND TREVISO, Church of St Justin Martyr, Auronzo
di Cadore, Tuesday, 24 July 2007.
<http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2007/july/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20070724_clero-cadore_en.html>*
------------------------------
Apparently most Roman Catholic schools have taught evolution pretty much as
fact since Pope Pius XII's encyclical HUMANI GENERIS in 1950. I even have a
Catholic acquaintance who confirms that he was taught evolution as fact by
Jesuits while in a Catholic school, so to most Catholics the Pope's remarks
probably come as no great surprise.
So can the Catholic accept evolution? Is it compatible with the Bible?
Could the Pope be right about evolution? Please continue on to my article *
Did God create the world through Evolution?
<http://biblelight.net/7days.htm>*

------------------------------

,_._,___



-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to