[Yet, a serial liar, and no ordinary one, claims that the Congress pressurised the Supreme Court! (Ref.: < https://m-timesofindia-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/m.timesofindia.com/india/congress-bullied-sc-judge-to-stall-temple-case-till-after-poll-pm-modi/amp_articleshow/66801422.cms?usqp=mq331AQHCAFYAYABAQ%3D%3D&_js_v=0.1#referrer=https://www.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s >.)
And, Indresh is, in no way, a sole deviant from the Sangh stable. (Ref.: < https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc-insulted-hindus-by-deferring-ram-temple-hearing-rss/articleshow/66475273.cms> and < https://www.firstpost.com/politics/rss-general-secretary-bhaiyyaji-joshi-says-will-repeat-1992-stir-if-needed-after-sc-postpones-ayodhya-hearing-5492731.html >.) This, on the face of it, is a clear illustration of contempt of court - attacking judges for pre-conceived bias. Just a part of the project of dismantling the watchdog institutions to safeguard the Indian Constitution and its essential features, including "secularism" and "democracy". 《Claiming that the Centre plans to bring a law on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute but has been silent in view of the Model Code of Conduct for the ongoing Assembly elections, RSS leader Indresh Kumar Tuesday attacked the Supreme Court’s “three-judge bench… known to the public” for “delaying” a decision on the Ayodhya title suit.》 As regards Modi's claim that the SC judges were scared into subission with the threat of impeachment, the facts are as under: I. The impeachment motion, against the then CJI, was rejected, apparently in a rush, by the Vice President on ***April 23 2018*** . (Ref.: < https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/live-impeachment-motion-against-cji-dipak-misra/liveblog/63877304.cms >.) (It had been moved by individual RS MPs. Manmohan Singh, P Chidambaram, A M Singhvi were prominent non-signatories to the motion from the Congress.)] II. <<The Supreme Court today (i.e. on ***Sept 27 2018***) declined to refer the question that “a mosque as a place of prayer is an essential part of Islam” to a Constitution bench. The crucial verdict also paved the way for holding the hearing on title suit on October 29. The 1994 judgement of the Supreme Court had observed that “a mosque is not an essential part of the practice of the religion of Islam and namaz can be offered anywhere, even in the open”. The apex court’s decision today will be on a raft of petitions by a few Muslim groups challenging this 1994 judgement. A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer had reserved the verdict on ***July 20*** [emphasis added].>> (Ref.: < https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/supreme-court-verdict-is-mosque-integral-to-islam-muslim-live-updates-ayodhya-babri-masjid-ram-janmabhoomi-case/1328444/ >.) III. <<The Supreme Court on Monday (i.e. ***Oct. 29 2018***) turned down requests for an early hearing in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi title dispute and said the top court will decide the course of hearings in the first week of January. In a hearing that barely lasted five minutes, a three-judge bench headed by ***Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi*** [emphasis added] dismissed requests by additional solicitor general Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the Uttar Pradesh government, and senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan, who represented the deity Ram Lalla, that the court take up the dispute after the Diwali break.>> (Ref.: < https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/supreme-court-adjourns-ayodhya-case-hearing-till-january-2019/story-qLbgwx1BMppHkpzasooWQM.html >.) IV. So, ***the impeachment motion*** (against the preceding CJI, which'd come as a sequel to the unprecedented public revolt against him by his four immediate juniors including the incumbent CJI) ***could have had not any impact on the Supreme Court decision on the Ayodhya case***, having already been rejected and the last deferment coming under a new CJI. ***The claim is just a plain lie***.] https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ayodhya-ram-temple-rss-supreme-court-indresh-vhp-5468030/?fbclid=IwAR0tqNwCgeoCe33r4zEDVStGgXgci8BSa_q1peiW3szW29RWQF-2rffnWRE Ayodhya: Indresh of RSS slams CJI-bench, claims govt is ready with a law He claimed there was growing anguish against “two-three” judges. “All are looking forward to justice. They still have belief... but the judiciary, judges and justice have been disrespected because of two-three judges... It should be heard early. What is the problem?" By Express News Service |Chandigarh | Updated: November 28, 2018 10:25:10 am Ayodhya: Indresh of RSS slams CJI-bench, claims govt is ready with a law Proposed Ram Temple Replica seen at VHP organised relegious meeting in Ayodhya on sunday.Express photo by Vishal Srivastav 25.11.2018 Claiming that the Centre plans to bring a law on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute but has been silent in view of the Model Code of Conduct for the ongoing Assembly elections, RSS leader Indresh Kumar Tuesday attacked the Supreme Court’s “three-judge bench… known to the public” for “delaying” a decision on the Ayodhya title suit. He said if someone goes to the Supreme Court against the law that the government plans to bring, “it is possible that the Chief Justice will issue a stay (Ho sakta hai aadesh laane ke khilaf koi sarfira Supreme Court jayega, toh aaj ka Chief Justice usey stay bhi kar sakta hai)”. Referring to the CJI-led bench’s decision to defer hearing on the Ayodhya matter to January, Indresh said: “I haven’t taken names because 125 crore Indians know their names… the three-judge bench… they delayed, they denied, they disrespected”. He then went on to say “will the country be so handicapped” that it lets “two-three” judges “throttle its beliefs, democracy, Constitution and fundamental rights”. Ayodhya: Indresh of RSS slams CJI-bench, claims govt is ready with a law Indresh Kumar at Panjab University. (Express Photo by Kamleshwar Singh) Speaking at a seminar titled ‘Janmabhoomi mein anyay kyun’, organised by the Joshi Foundation on the campus of the Panjab University, Indresh said: “Will you and I watch helplessly? Why, and for what? Jo aatankwad ko ardh raatri mein sun sakte hain, woh shanti ko apmaan aur uphas kar de (Should those who hear cases against terror at midnight insult and ridicule peace)… Even the English did not have the courage to perpetrate such atrocities on the judicial process.” “Is it not so serious? We saw the black day of the Indian judicial system when justice was delayed and denied by disrespecting the beliefs of people. Supreme Court did not do it. Judges did not do it. Judicial system did not do it. Justice did not do it. But a few persons,” he said. He claimed there was growing anguish against “two-three” judges. “All are looking forward to justice. They still have belief… but the judiciary, judges and justice have been disrespected because of two-three judges… It should be heard early. What is the problem? Otherwise, a question arises: if they are not ready to deliver justice, they should think if they want to remain judges or resign,” he said. -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
