[So very touching and powerful!
That's why she was barred.

She had been a prominent voice against the Emergency.
Now, in her closing years, against this reigning bloody tyranny.

<<Most of you were not born in the 1940s and you grew up in an independent
country, so I have shared this personal story to show you the courage and
discipline of those times and the spirit of the men and women who fought
for freedom. My parents were among many thousands of Indians – known and
unknown, young and old – who committed their lives to that great fight and
suffered all kinds of hardship because they had a passion for freedom. I
want to ask you, do we have that same passion for freedom today? Are we
worthy of those men and women who have gone before us, some of whom died
fighting so that future Indians could live in freedom?

I am asking this question because our freedoms are in danger. The dangers
to them are so much on my mind that when I was thinking about what I should
say to you, I knew I had to talk about all that is happening in India
today, because it is affecting every side of our lives: what we eat, who we
marry, what we think, what we write, and, of course, how we worship.
...
Diversity is the very meaning of our civilisation. We have old literatures
in many different languages. We eat different foods, we dress differently,
we have different festivals, and we follow different religions.
Inclusiveness has been our way of life and this ancient multicultural
civilisation whose name is India is a most remarkable achievement that no
other country has known. Today it is threatened by a policy to wipe out our
religious and cultural differences and force us into a single identity.
With one stroke, this policy wipes out the constitutional rights of
millions of our countrymen and women who are not Hindus, and makes
invaders, outsiders and enemies of them. At Independence, our founding
fathers rejected a religious identity and had the wisdom to declare India a
secular democratic republic, not because they were against religion but
because they understood that in our country of many religions, only a
secular state would provide the overall umbrella of neutrality under which
every Indian would have the right to live and worship according to his or
her faith. The Constituent Assembly that took this decision was made up of
a majority of Hindus, yet they drew up a Constitution whose preamble
affirmed a life of liberty, equality, and fraternity for all Indians.
...
What can writers do in this situation? The answer is: we can write.
...
I want to thank my hosts for giving me this opportunity to speak to you.
[Alas, it was withdrawn!] I have spoken from the heart because of the
crossroads our country is at. Which way we go – towards freedom or away
from it – will depend, among other things, on what we write and our refusal
to be bullied into silence. In memory of the Indians who have been
murdered, in support of all those who are upholding the right to dissent,
and of the dissenters who live in fear and uncertainty, but still speak
their minds, let us choose freedom.>>]

https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/nayantara-sehgal-marathi-sahitya-sammelan-speech-5527383/

Nayantara Sahgal’s speech for Marathi Sahitya Sammelan: In some cases, our
duty to hurt sentiments
A day before the inauguration of the 92nd Akhil Bhartiya Marathi Sahitya
Sammelan at Yavatmal, English litterateur Nayantara Sahgal, a Sahitya
Akademi awardee, was informed that her invite had been revoked. The
organisers said threat issued by some local activists through media to
disrupt the event had forced them to take the call. Here is the full text
of the speech she was to deliver at the event.
Yavatmal |

Updated: January 8, 2019 1:52:04 pm

English litterateur Nayantara Sahgal, a Sahitya Akademi awardee, was
informed that her invite had been revoked. (Express archive photo)

Written by Nayantara Sahgal

This is an emotional moment for me and I feel privileged to be here with
you. I feel I am standing in the shadow of great Maharashtrians – Mahadev
Govind Ranade who founded this sammelan, and whose name is part of the
modern history of our country, and the distinguished Marathi writers who
have chaired its conventions, and all the writers who have taken part in
its sessions and whose writing has enriched the great creative enterprise
known as Indian literature.

It is also an emotional moment for me because of my own connection with
Maharashtra through my father, Ranjit Sitaram Pandit. I would like to tell
you a little about him. He was a Sanskrit scholar from a family of
distinguished Sanskrit scholars and he translated three Sanskrit classics
into English: Mudra Rakshasa, Kalidas’s Ritusamhara and Rajtarangini.
Rajtarangini is the twelfth-century history of the kings of Kashmir by
Kalhana, and it had a special fascination for my father because his two
great loves were Sanskrit and Kashmir. He worked on this translation during
two of his jail terms during British rule and dedicated it to his Kashmiri
father-in-law Pandit Motilal Nehru. His brother-in-law, Jawaharlal Nehru,
wrote an introduction to this work when it was published. I am deeply
grateful to Dr Aruna Dhere and Shri Prashant Talnikar for their great
labour of translating this massive history into my father’s, and their own,
native tongue, Marathi. I know that nothing would have made him happier.

Both my parents took part in the national movement for freedom under
Mahatma Gandhi. My mother, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, was imprisoned three
times and my father four times. During his fourth imprisonment he fell
seriously ill in the terrible conditions and environment of Bareilly jail,
and was given no medical treatment and my mother was not informed how very
ill he was. Yet he had refused to ask for his release. When she was finally
informed of his condition she was allowed to have a twenty-minute interview
with him. It took place, according to the rule, in the office of the jail
superintendent and under his watchful eye, which gave a political prisoner
no privacy with his visitor. It shocked my mother to see him brought in on
a stretcher. His head had been shaved and his body was emaciated. She
almost broke down at the sight of him but somehow she held back her tears
because she knew he would not want her to cry in front of the jailer. He
told her why he wouldn’t ask for the favour of being released. He said “I
have fought with the lions, Gandhi and Nehru. Do you want me to behave like
a jackal now?” She knew she couldn’t change his mind so she controlled
herself and sat near the stretcher and held his hand, and gave him news of
home and the children, and what was growing in the garden he loved. When
the government released him at last, it was only to die about three weeks
later. Many years later, after independence, my mother was India’s High
Commissioner in Britain and sat next to Prime Minister Winston Churchill at
a lunch, and he said to her, “We killed your husband, didn’t we?” It was an
admission that took her by surprise.

Lynch mobs are openly attacking and killing Muslims on invented rumours
that they were killing cows and eating beef. We are watching all this
lawlessness on TV.
Most of you were not born in the 1940s, and you grew up in an independent
country, so I have shared this personal story with you to show you the
courage and discipline of those times, and the spirit of the men and women
who fought for freedom. My parents were among many thousands of Indians –
known and unknown, young and old – who committed their lives to that great
fight and suffered all kinds of hardship because they had a passion for
freedom. I want to ask you, do we have that same passion for freedom today?
Are we worthy of those men and women who have gone before us, some of whom
died fighting so that future Indians could live in freedom?

I am asking this question because our freedoms are in danger. The dangers
to them are so much on my mind that when I was thinking about what I should
say to you, I knew I had to talk about all that is happening in India
today, because it is affecting every side of our lives: what we eat, whom
we marry, what we think and what we write, and, of course, how we worship.
Today we have a situation where diversity, and opposition to the ruling
ideology, are under fierce attack. Diversity is the very meaning of our
civilisation. We have old literature in many different languages. We eat
different foods, we dress differently, we have different festivals, and we
follow different religions. Inclusiveness has been our way of life, and
this ancient multi-cultural civilisation whose name is India is a most
remarkable achievement that no other country has known. Today it is
threatened by a policy to wipe out our religious and cultural differences
and force us into a single religious and cultural identity. At one stroke
this policy wipes out the Constitutional rights of millions of our
countrymen and women who are not Hindus and makes invaders, outsiders and
enemies of them. At Independence our founding fathers rejected a religious
identity and had the wisdom to declare India a secular democratic republic,
not because they were against religion but because they understood that in
our deeply religious country of many religions, only a secular state would
provide the overall umbrella of neutrality under which every Indian would
have the right to live and worship according to his or her faith.

The Constituent Assembly which took this decision was made up of a majority
of Hindus, yet they drew up a Constitution whose preamble affirmed a life
of liberty, equality, and fraternity for all Indians. This high ideal was
inspired by Ambedkar, who was the chief architect of the Constitution, and
a great Maharashtrian whose insistence that all human beings are equal,
started a revolution against caste. That high ideal has now been thrown
aside. The minorities, and those who don’t support the Hindu rashtra
agenda, have become targets for fanatics who roam the streets. We have
recently seen five citizens falsely charged with conspiracy and arrested on
grounds of sedition. These are men and women who have spent years of their
lives working for tribal rights and forest rights, and for justice for the
marginalised. Christian churches have been vandalised and Christians are
feeling insecure. Lynch mobs are openly attacking and killing Muslims on
invented rumours that they were killing cows and eating beef. We are
watching all this lawlessness on TV. In Uttar Pradesh, these mob attacks on
the cow pretext have become common, while the authorities stand by and look
on. When terrorism of this kind becomes official, as it has in Uttar
Pradesh, where can we look for justice? Mob violence backed by the state
goes on in many places on defenceless people, and the guilty have not been
convicted. In some cases, their victims have been charged with the crimes
instead, and in some cases, the criminals have been congratulated. The
human cost of this tragic situation is that it is a time of fear and grief
for many Indians who no longer feel safe living and worshipping as they
have always done, and have a right to do. The poor and helpless among them
– some of whom have been driven out of their villages and their homes and
jobs – are living without work, or help, or hope, or future.

I write novels and my material for story-telling has been political. As we
writers know, we do not choose our material. We make stories out of the
material and atmosphere around us, and because I grew up during the years
of the fight for freedom, the values of that time and of the nation it
created have been the stuff of my fiction and non-fiction. I have thought
of my novels as being about the making of modern India. But because my last
two novels are about the times we are now living in, they are about the
un-making of modern India.

As we are writers, let us look at what is happening to our fellow writers
and artists in this political atmosphere. We are seeing that the
questioning mind, the creative imagination, and freedom of expression have
no place in the present political climate, and where there is no respect
for freedom of thought or for democratic rights, writing becomes a risky
activity. This has always been the case in authoritarian regimes all over
the world where art is kept under state control and writers face punishment
and persecution if they step out of line. Take the example of a young poet
called Josef Brodsky in Stalin’s Soviet Union. Brodsky is arrested and his
interrogator waves a paper at him and says, “Do you call yourself a poet?
Do you call this a poem? It is not a poem if it makes no material
contribution to the Soviet Union.” And he throws Brodsky into jail. Years
later, Josef Brodsky wins the Nobel Prize for Literature. Another famous
Russsian case is of Solzhenitsyn, who was condemned to hard labour in
Siberia for many years for criticising the government, and who also won the
Nobel Prize for Literature. And now the same ignorance about art and
literature is in action here, and writers are facing the anger of ignorant
criticism, and much worse. Three eminent Maharashtrian rationalists,
Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare and M.M. Kalburgi, have been shot dead
for rejecting superstition in favour of reason, and Gauri Lankesh of
Bengaluru for her independent views and her opposition to Hindutva. Others
have been threatened with death and forbidden to write. We are told, ‘Don’t
publish your book or we will burn it. Don’t exhibit your paintings or we
will destroy your exhibition.’ Filmmakers are told, ‘Change the dialogue in
this scene and cut out the next scene or we will not let your film be
shown, and if you show it we will attack the cinema hall. Don’t do anything
to hurt our sentiments’.

In other words, they are saying: do as you are told, or your life and your
art are not safe. But the creative imagination cannot take orders from the
state, or from the mob. And the question of hurting sentiments is, of
course, nonsense. A population of one billion people cannot be made to
think alike. Every community has its own views and its own sensitivities on
various issues. But sentiments cannot decide what is right or wrong. In
some cases it is even our duty to hurt sentiments. If we had been forbidden
to hurt sentiments, we would still be burning widows, and no reform of any
kind would have taken place.

Many sentiments were hurt when the Hindu Code Bill was being debated and
sadhus threw stones at Parliament house. But if the Bill had not been
passed, Hindu women would have had no rights.

Historians are feeling the heat now that Indian history has been brought
under state control. In some States, large chunks of the past have been
distorted or done away with altogether. And this is the work of Hindutva
minds who have been specially chosen to rewrite it. If I were to invent a
dialogue between an Indian historian and one of these re-writers of Indian
history, it would go something like this. The historian says to the
re-writer: ‘Akbar won the battle of Haldighati. But in this book, you are
saying that he lost it. How come?’ The re-writer replies, ‘He lost it
because I have decided that he lost it. History is what we say it is.’ Some
of these rewritten textbooks have wiped out the whole Mughal empire, and
not content with wiping out the past, all remaining reminders of it are
being demolished. The Babri Masjid has been knocked down, and Mughal and
Muslim names of towns and roads are being changed. Some textbooks have
censored all mention of Nehru, whose governments laid the foundation of
modern India, and Mahatma Gandhi was of course murdered by this mentality
in 1948 for the blasphemy of the mantra he gave us: Ishvar Allah tere nam;
Sab ko sammati de Bhagvan. Gandhi’s non-violence is seen as emasculating
Indians and making cowards of them. Personally, I think that nothing needed
greater heroism than the way unarmed Indians confronted the armed might of
an empire. One of my novels called Lesser Breeds is my tribute to that
unique time.

With all that is being wiped out, so is the scientific frame of mind that
we have cultivated since independence. It is being replaced by myths and
legends, and a medieval frame of mind.

In some cases it is even our duty to hurt sentiments. If we had been
forbidden to hurt sentiments, we would still be burning widows, and no
reform of any kind would have taken place.
We have been justly proud of the key institutions we have built up since
independence, but they, too, have been brought under state control –
whether they concern art and literature, or history, or technology, or
science, information, education and culture. Our public universities, our
museums and Akademies are no longer independent institutions. The Nehru
Memorial Museum and Library in Delhi was an early example of the damage
that is being done to our institutions, and Jawaharlal Nehru University is
an ongoing target of Hindutva hatred. As a Hindu and a believer in the
great enlightened inheritance known as Sanatan Dharma, I cannot accept
Hindutva.

In this war that has been declared on diversity, dissent and debate, those
who care about freedom have not stayed silent. There are marches and
rallies against the destruction of our fundamental rights. There are
protests by retired civil servants, by students and academics, lawyers,
historians and scientists, Dalits and Adivasis, and the farmers’ huge
demand for their rights. The large numbers of farmers’ suicides in this
area show the desperate situation they are no longer unable to face. The
Bhim Army, named after Dr Ambedkar, is making its voice heard, and we are
reminded that it has an inheritance of dramatic revolt, when Ambedkar and
E.V. Ramasamy Periyar publicly burned the Manusmriti in the 1920s for the
insulting and objectionable laws it laid down for Dalits in the caste
system, condemning them to an inferior status. The singer, T.M. Krishna,
and the historian, Ramchandra Guha, are among those who have made strong
individual protests. Krishna’s concert was cancelled and Ram Guha received
a death threat. Recently, a great actor, Naseeruddin Shah, has spoken out
against the war on Islam and how he fears for his children.

Though our music and dance and theatre and films bring us together, our
literature keeps us apart, and we cannot know each other until we can read
each other.
What can writers do in this situation? The answer is: we can write.
Powerful fiction has been the result of writers stepping into controversy
and taking sides, but not as polemics or propaganda. Their plays and poems
and novels have been about people, not ideas, and they have been written by
authors who were deeply engaged with the times they were living in, and
some are still living in. Writers don’t live in ivory towers. Through our
writing, we take sides between good and evil, right and wrong. Great
literature worldwide by writers of many nationalities has done this, and
this is the literature that has touched chords in succeeding generations
and stays alive. We show where we stand by the subjects we choose, the
stories we write, and the way we write them. Whether we are writing about
our grandmother’s cooking, or the rain on the roof, or describing the body
of our beloved, every word we write makes it clear where we stand. Writing,
like all forms of creative art, is a powerful form of political activism,
and it is a means of revolt. That is why dictators are so afraid of it and
take steps to control it.

A writers’ protest started as an Award Wapasi movement three years ago,
when about a hundred of us returned our Sahitya Akademi Awards over the
murder of an Award-winning writer, Dr Dhabolkar, which the Akademi took no
notice of. But after the lynching of the poor blacksmith, Mohammed Akhlaq,
in Dadri village outside Delhi, our movement has grown and widened to cover
other issues concerning attacks on democracy and human rights.

I have mentioned the writing of foreign writers. It has left its mark on my
mind because I have been able to read some of it in translation. What about
Indian writing in our many languages? It is a tragedy that we cannot read
each other for lack of translation. Though our music and dance and theatre
and films bring us together, our literature keeps us apart, and we cannot
know each other until we can read each other. I can only hope that
publishers will fill this gap and that Indian literature will become
available not only to us but across the world.

I have to pay a special tribute to Maharashtrian women writers, because of
the formidable obstacles that women have to overcome when they put their
life experiences into words on a page. They run the risk of offending
husband, family, and society, and suffering the consequences. May their
courage and their creative energy go from strength to strength.

I want to thank my hosts for giving me this opportunity to speak to you,
and I have spoken from the heart because of the crossroads our country is
at. Which way we go – towards freedom or away from it – will depend, among
other things, on what we write, and our refusal to be bullied into silence.
In memory of the Indians who have been murdered, in support of all those
who are upholding the right to dissent, and of the dissenters who live in
fear and uncertainty, but still speak their minds, let us choose freedom.

Thank you for listening to me.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to