On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:29:48PM +0200, Élie Roux wrote:
> > shall we use what SGMod has and just add the missing
> > stuff to that at new code points, or something else (in my font I've
> > temporarily reserved 32 characters per variations of each neume kind,
> > because until it is at least close to complete I didn't want to guess how
> > many glyphs I'll be able to get).
>
> Well, it would require more thinking, I'll have to put my brain in it
> again, which I won't be able to do before beginning of August... But if
> you name your glyphs with a good logic, it will be easy to rename them
> in the definitive mapping (or we could take yours).
I haven't been naming the glyphs actually, only put some names in glyph
comments. I guess if we agree on how to represent all the glyphs in my font
and all (or most of) the glyphs in SGallModern in nabc, then best naming
would be the nabc string, though not sure if the names may contain say
colons. Or we could name the characters using the SGallModern names (and
invent new names for what it doesn't have).
> > Sure. Though the Cardine font is in metafont originally, while I've been
> > using the (admittedly low quality, just from the mostly ~ 16Mpx scans,
> > so about 25 to 150 pixels high characters) and fontographer only.
Ah, I've mistyped, meant to type fontforge.
Jakub
_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
