2015-06-09 20:22 GMT+02:00 Henry So Jr. <[email protected]>: > The "lower tail" of the oriscus reversus (the oriscus was not pictured) > seems narrower than the "upper tail". I'd prefer them to be more the > same, such that rotating the oriscus 180 degrees would yield the same > shape. This could just be a rendering issue, but the "old" version > looks fine when zoomed in whereas the "new" one doesn't. >
Hmm, maybe you're correct... Elie, should I correct the glyph and repost it? The punctum descendens looks passable by itself, but when joined as part > of a clivis, it looks out-of-place to me. I think that perhaps there is > too much of an upward curve to the stroke. I think that this is the price to pay for a clearer shape when it's alone... Looking at Solesmes' scores I see quite the same effect, comparing this neume alone and in composition with others. I'll think about a milder shape, anyway... > Any chance of redrawing the punctum inclinatum auctus as well? I think > that's the final glyph needing revision in Greciliae for readability. > Yes, I can do this. Actually, I don't use this neume so I didn't think to change this shape, too, but you're right, I'll try to do something. Thank you very much, Sr. M. Ruth
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
