Hi, It is a known issue. It only happens on the first plot, because gnuplot is loading to memory.
Does it takes more than, let's say, a minute? That would be strange and we should give a better look into. Hélio On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, yinung at Gmail <yinung.cycu(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Dear all, > > Recently I found that if I plot a series right after a new installation of > gretl for windows (typically upgrading to a new release), it takes a pretty > long time to generate a graph. Some of my students might think that gretl is > "dead" at that moment but in fact it is not. > > Does anyone have a clue about this? > > Thanks > > Yi-Nung Yang > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gretl-users mailing list > Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu > http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users >Hi,
It is a known issue. It only happens on the first plot, because gnuplot is loading to memory.
Does it takes more than, let's say, a minute? That would be strange and we should give a better look into.
Hélio
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, yinung at Gmail <yinung.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
Recently I found that if I plot a series right after a new installation of gretl for windows (typically upgrading to a new release), it takes a pretty long time to generate a graph. Some of my students might think that gretl is "dead" at that moment but in fact it is not.Â
Does anyone have a clue about this?
Thanks
Yi-Nung Yang
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
gretl-us...@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
