Thank you very much Zipitria

--- On Sat, 4/30/11, Leandro Zipitria <leandro.zipitria(a)gmail.com> wrote:

From: Leandro Zipitria <leandro.zipitria(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Changing Language
To: "Gretl list" <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
List-Post: gretl-users@gretlml.univpm.it
Date: Saturday, April 30, 2011, 8:36 PM

Just go to "Outlis" - "Preferences" - "General", and change the language in 
"Lange".
Then you have to reopen Gretl.

Regards
Leandro

2011/5/1 Anutechia Asongu <simplice_peace(a)yahoo.com>


Hi All, 
          Could any one be of help in gisting me on how to change the language 
from French to English?. I'll be greatful

--- On Sat, 4/30/11, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:


From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Johansen question

To: "Gretl list" <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
List-Post: gretl-users@gretlml.univpm.it
Date: Saturday, April 30, 2011, 7:17 PM

On Sun, 1 May 2011, Talha Yalta wrote:


> I want to add a table which will show Johansen tests can give
> different results in small samples when different parameters are used.
> In the table, I just use the trace test results (since this is just to

>
 prove a point) and choose lags 1, 2, and 3. I also use the default
> case as well as the --ct option. This results in 6 combinations.
>
> Here is how I proceed:
>
> For a bivariate case, if the trace test rejects c=0 and does not

> reject c=1, I report c=1.

OK.

> If it is the other way around, then I report c=0 as the test
> result.

On the trace test, that result would seem anomalous, and
indicative of a small-sample problem. If there's "enough evidence"

to reject c=1 (with an alternative of c=2), then concluding that
c=0 is problematic.

> As you know, sometimes the results can be contradictory so that c=0
> and c=1 are rejected (or not rejected) simultaneously.


That doesn't seem contradictory: if both c=0 and c=1 are rejected,
that favors the hypothesis that both series are stationary. If
neither c=0 nor c=1 is rejected that suggests they're
 both
non-stationary, and not cointegrated.

Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu

http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users

_______________________________________________


Gretl-users mailing list

Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu

http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
Thank you very much Zipitria

--- On Sat, 4/30/11, Leandro Zipitria <leandro.zipit...@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Leandro Zipitria <leandro.zipit...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Changing Language
To: "Gretl list" <gretl-us...@lists.wfu.edu>
Date: Saturday, April 30, 2011, 8:36 PM

Just go to "Outlis" - "Preferences" - "General", and change the language in "Lange".
Then you have to reopen Gretl.

Regards
Leandro

2011/5/1 Anutechia Asongu <simplice_pe...@yahoo.com>
Hi All,
          Could any one be of help in gisting me on how to change the language from French to English?. I'll be greatful

--- On Sat, 4/30/11, Allin Cottrell <cottr...@wfu.edu> wrote:

From: Allin Cottrell <cottr...@wfu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Johansen question
To: "Gretl list" <gretl-us...@lists.wfu.edu>
Date: Saturday, April 30, 2011, 7:17 PM

On Sun, 1 May 2011, Talha Yalta wrote:

> I want to add a table which will show Johansen tests can give
> different results in small samples when different parameters are used.
> In the table, I just use the trace test results (since this is just to
> prove a point) and choose lags 1, 2, and 3. I also use the default
> case as well as the --ct option. This results in 6 combinations.
>
> Here is how I proceed:
>
> For a bivariate case, if the trace test rejects c=0 and does not
> reject c=1, I report c=1.

OK.

> If it is the other way around, then I report c=0 as the test
> result.

On the trace test, that result would seem anomalous, and
indicative of a small-sample problem. If there's "enough evidence"
to reject c=1 (with an alternative of c=2), then concluding that
c=0 is problematic.

> As you know, sometimes the results can be contradictory so that c=0
> and c=1 are rejected (or not rejected) simultaneously.

That doesn't seem contradictory: if both c=0 and c=1 are rejected,
that favors the hypothesis that both series are stationary. If
neither c=0 nor c=1 is rejected that suggests they're both
non-stationary, and not cointegrated.

Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
gretl-us...@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users

_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
gretl-us...@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
gretl-us...@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users

Reply via email to