> > > I'd be happy to submit patches once it's converted to roff but I > > > just can't bring myself to submit documentation fixes to roff > > > docs written in texinfo. > > > > Sorry, this won't happen for various reasons. > > I know you've told me before but it must not have been a very > satisfying answer since I can't remember. What are the reasons? It > would seem like we could fine enough groff hackers to redo the docs > in roff.
There are some reasons, the first of them rather imperative. . Documentation of GNU projects should be in texinfo format. Amen. . groff.texinfo is just a reference. It is not meant as an example how to do nifty things with groff. As that, the format is really of no importance -- I would really like to see the UTP to be extended to cover groff features, as mentioned already. . There is no equivalent to the `info' program for groff input since no good groff2texi converter exists. Werner _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff