[dropped CCs to Robert and bug-groff] At 2022-07-08T14:18:38-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > I now see diagnostics from afmtodit that I've never observed before, > though I think other people have reported them. I suspect they are > freshly exposed bugs in our "font/devps/generate/textmap" file. > > BuildFoundries: notice: Copied grops font EURO... > afmtodit: both Delta and uni0394 map to *D at > /home/branden/BUILD/groff-1.23.0.rc1.2705-ad3dc/afmtodit line 6447. > afmtodit: both mu and uni03BC map to *m at > /home/branden/BUILD/groff-1.23.0.rc1.2705-ad3dc/afmtodit line 6447. > afmtodit: both mu and uni03BC map to mc at > /home/branden/BUILD/groff-1.23.0.rc1.2705-ad3dc/afmtodit line 6447. > BuildFoundries: notice: Generated U-AB... > > I get these warnings for all of the URW text fonts (i.e., all except U-S > and U-ZD).
I figured out why I wasn't seeing these before. In my workaday Debian-based environment, I have both "gsfonts" and "fonts-urw-base35" installed. In my Debian bullseye chroot, I have only the latter. The "gsfonts" AFM files are thus found in preference to the "fonts-urw-base45" AFM files. Here is an example of the files in question. gsfonts: /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/a010015l.afm fonts-urw-base35: /usr/share/fonts/type1/urw-base35/URWGothic-Demi.afm Which one of these should we prefer? I'll check this assumption, but I'm guessing the latter have greater glyph coverage and that's why we're getting gripes from afmtodit about the mappings. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
