I'm +1 since other organizer groups do it and because there isn't years worth of private history. In mailing lists with years worth of private history, I'd be -1.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Brian Ray <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 > > I am not sure I agree with the change in the setting for group organizers > as we may want to discuss things we (as group organizers) want to discuss > with other group organizers before proposing to a public forum. However, I > would love to hear what others think. > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, sheila miguez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've wanted to provide links to posts for people multiple times now, and >> can't. >> >> -- >> [email protected] >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/attachments/20150730/e8a14f4e/attachment.html >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Group-Organizers mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/group-organizers >> > > > > -- > Brian Ray > @brianray > (773) 669-7717 > -- [email protected] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/attachments/20150730/5b4b231c/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Group-Organizers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/group-organizers
