On 7/30/15 9:13 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 30.07.2015 18:11, sheila miguez wrote:
I'm +1 since other organizer groups do it and because there isn't years
worth of private history. In mailing lists with years worth of private
history, I'd be -1.
+1 as well.
+1 as well. Public archives are a valuable resource for sharing
knowledge with *potential* group organizers.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Brian Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
-1
I am not sure I agree with the change in the setting for group organizers
as we may want to discuss things we (as group organizers) want to discuss
with other group organizers before proposing to a public forum. However, I
would love to hear what others think.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, sheila miguez <[email protected]> wrote:
I've wanted to provide links to posts for people multiple times now, and
can't.
--
*Carol Willing*
Developer | Willing Consulting
https://willingconsulting.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/attachments/20150730/cb674398/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Group-Organizers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/group-organizers
