Its been a long time, but the consensus appears to be to accept this as a working group draft.

peter


On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:58 AM, LOWE Jim wrote:

Hi Peter,

Since I'm a co-author of the document in question, this might be in bad
taste, but I would like to see the document go forward as a working
group draft.

Cheers,
Jim.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Peter Schoenmaker
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [GROW] new working group items

hi,

We would like to poll the group about a new working group item.

o  at dublin dimitri papadimitriou presented on draft-dimitri-grow-
rss-03.txt.  <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dimitri-grow-rss-03.txt>
I would like to ask if the working group thinks we should adopt this as
a working group draft?  The proposal is to make this an experimental
RFC.

Thanks

peter


_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to