Hi,

He Yan wrote:
> Toward
> this end, we have BGP data available in an XML format rather than MRT.
> Compared with MRT, XML is more extensible, human and machine-readable
> and can serve as a common interface for a variety of tools.

This looks interesting. A quick question: what is the amount of on-disk
data that you collect with this?

With RIS, we now collect 22GB of gzipped MRT per month, for ~110 full
peers. So every full peer gets us about 200MB of gzipped data per month.

Are these figures higher with your XML-based format (with compression -
I imagine the XML compresses better than MRT) ?

I know that disk space is considered cheap, but we still have
limitations in this.

cheers,
Erik Romijn
RIPE NCC RIS
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to