On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:55:39AM -0500, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > Based on feedback from the GROW list and a couple of private > e-mails, I have submitted draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-02.txt. Any > additional comments/suggestions are welcome. I am discussing the best > way to advance this draft as a Proposed Standard with the ADs. > > Regards, > Brian
Hi, The small table in Sec. 2 characterizes the new attributes as mandatory. While I like the idea, I don't think mandatory is the right thing because people may have some kinds of reasons for not having such an address set up or perhaps not being ready at the time when they need to submit the object. Do others have thoughts on this piece? Thanks, Tony _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
