+1 Support

(2011/04/01 17:19), Christopher Morrow wrote:
> (+wg this time, for realz)
> 
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Christopher Morrow
> <christopher.mor...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Given the discussion in the room today, and the overlap of
>> readers-of-draft + folk-asking-for-adoption a call to the list is
>> appropriate.
>>
>> For the draft: draft-shakir-idr-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling
>>   
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-shakir-idr-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling-01.txt>
>>
>> "BGP-4 is utilised as a key intra- and inter-Autonomous System routing
>>    protocol in modern IP networks.  The failure modes as defined by the
>>    original protocol standards are based on a number of assumptions
>>    around the impact of session failure.  Numerous incidents both in the
>>    global Internet routing table and within Service Provider networks
>>    have been caused by strict handling of a single invalid UPDATE
>>    message causing large-scale failures in one or more Autonomous
>>    Systems.
>>
>>    This memo describes the current use of BGP-4 within Service Provider
>>    networks, and outlines a set of requirements for further work to
>>    enhance the mechanisms available to a BGP-4 implementation when
>>    erroneous data is detected.  Whilst this document does not provide
>>    specification of any standard, it is intended as an overview of a set
>>    of enhancements to BGP-4 to improve the protocol's robustness to suit
>>    its current deployment."
>>
>> can we have some discussion about adoption in GROW for this at this
>> time, please?
>>
>> Call ends 4/14/2011
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Chris
>> grow-wg-co-chair
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
> 


_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to