These are some pretty significant changes that themselves could be an internet-draft/document, methinks. Perhaps those so interested in C.I.A in their comments could contribute some text, this was meant to be more operational.
I hope Eric has the cycles to resolve these [non-trivial comments] and if they did get resolved it¹d surely need to return to WG LC (IMO) ‹ and I¹d presuppose someone would find an opportunity to request a review from SIDR, although part of the intent was expressly to avoid beating that horse. I¹ll defer to Eric if he¹s going to be able to address these, but I can pretty much guarantee it won¹t see the RFC editor until well after Dallas (if ever, now). Alas, -danny On 3/2/15, 1:51 AM, "joel jaeggli" <[email protected]> wrote: >hello, > >would like to chase this one down and resolve it. > >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03015.html > >but haven't seen to much activity. > >lets do this thing and maybe we can publish this one before the upcoming >meeting. > >joel > >On 2/9/15 9:08 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: >> I'm under no illusion that terry's dicussion will have changed by the >> time he's installed. >> >> I would rather have it done sooner in any event. >> >> we did not get a change out prior ti the jan discussion and it stalled >> after that sorry. >> >> On 2/9/15 1:06 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Any progress on this? >>> >>> Just in case you were holding out the hope that my Discuss will expire >>>when I leave the IESG, I have to point out that my Discuss was to make >>>sure that the RTG Dir review by Terry Manderson gets attention. And >>>Terry will show up on the IESG when I leave :-) >>> >>> Shame to see a document sitting when it is so close to being done. >>> >>> Adrian >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: iesg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel >>>> Sent: 18 December 2014 15:33 >>>> To: The IESG >>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >>>>[email protected]; >>>> draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations....@tools.ietf.org >>>> Subject: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on >>>>draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy- >>>> considerations-05: (with DISCUSS) >>>> >>>> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for >>>> draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05: Discuss >>>> >>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut >>>>this >>>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>>> >>>> >>>> Please refer to >>>>http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>>> >>>> >>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>>> >>>>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-cons >>>>iderations/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> DISCUSS: >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> I'd like to see some discussion of the points raised by Terry >>>>Manderson >>>> in his Routing Directorate review during the IETF last call period >>>> (circulated on the Grow list at >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03015.html). >>>> >>>> By preference this discussion should be between the authors, WG, and >>>> reviewer. But I'd be happy to step in and own the discussions if that >>>> will help. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
