On 05/11/15 10:20, Jon Mitchell wrote: > Nit for author - any reason why such short abbreviation for ADDPATH (AP) > in section 4/5 subtypes while unicast/multicast spelled out - would it > be more readable as ADDPATH?
I was using the 'AS4' abbreviation that is already in place as a suggestion. Spelling it out fully (like unicast/multicast) would really result in '_ADDITIONAL_PATH' - ADDPATH is still an abbreviation But yes I think you're right, ADDPATH makes it more readable, and is a reasonable compromise between the very short and the very long versions. It also seems to be the current abbreviated term used by most people. I'll change it in the next revision. > Feel free to ignore if implementations are > already in place/use. The current implementations that are being worked on are still at the point where this is fairly easy to change at this stage, I think. Thanks for the feedback. Colin _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
