On 12/22/15 11:49 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 22/12/15 19:41, Randy Bush wrote: >>> And that's enough for me to clear my discuss too, yes. >>> >>> I guess saying IPsec is better than maybe badly specifying >>> how to do TLS, even though TLS is the more sensible thing >>> to do, >> >> and un-badly specifying tls is not possible? > > I'd say entirely possible, given some interest and > effort.
And of course implementation. > S > >> >> randy >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
