On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:54 PM, joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 6/26/16 10:06 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:31:17 +0000
> > joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> It's not clear to me how that would even work. assuming for the sake
> >> of arguement that the IXP by way of configured policy on the
> >> route-server adds this community to a prefix.
> >
> > Here is some detail on how DE-CIX implements it:
> >
> >   <
> https://www.de-cix.net/products-services/de-cix-frankfurt/blackholing/>
>
>
> At the the possible expense of belaboring my observation still further,
> i'm aware of how the community is implemented, I'm on those fabrics.
> What I wasn't and am not clear on is how that would lead to:
>
> Nick
>
> >>  In the case of route servers, blackholing turns the IXP into
> >>  a legal target.
>
> Job
>
> > I feel that this is not the appropiate forum to define what IXPs can,
> > can't, should and shouldn't in context of legal enforcement agencies.
>
> Short of the IXP engaging in prefix hijacking, or unilaterally applying
> the community to an existing prefix; the ixp is in not position to
> black-hole traffic except on request of the sender of the desitnation
> prefix. Likewise if you withdraw the prefix from the routeserver, the
> blackhole goes away, unless the route-server is engaged in prefix
> hijacking.
>
> I don't see either of those issues as serious threats. if you live under
> a regime that considers prefix hijacking acceptable, the community adds
> no capability that the exchange does not already have;they can afterall
> change the nexthop today, announce whatever prefix you're willing to
> accept and so on; any of those activities in most places would be
> immediate grounds for depeering and departure.
>
>
​Perhaps Nick is reacting to language like:
"​
 This well-known advisory transitive BGP
   community, namely BLACKHOLE, allows an origin AS to specify that a
   neighboring IP network or IXP should blackhole a specific IP prefix.
​"​

​which could be cleaned up a bit like:
"​This well-known advisory transitive BGP
   community, namely BLACKHOLE, allows an origin AS to specify that a
   neighboring IP network or IXP PARTICIPANT should blackhole a
   specific IP prefix."

This transform doesn't work through out the document though.
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to