Job Snijders wrote: > To address the latest concerns, draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-02 has been > posted. > > Executive summary: > > - Changed intended status from STD to INFO > - Added section 4 "Vendor Implementation Recommendations" > - Simplify the security section > - Clarify in introduction that this is about destination based > blackholing
Job, Sorry, but this update does not address the concerns raised about clarifying the behavioural semantics of this flag. It's also not clear why the security warning relating to denial of service attacks was removed. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
