Folks, During the IETF last call there were signficant concerns raised with this draft resulting in two revisions and a change in intended status to informational. Criticism of the proposal revolved largly along two axis.
* Advice on exchange point operation. This was largely removed. * Concern over the uncontrolled propigation of transitive attributes. The latter can potentially be ameliorated but not removed while using transitive attributes. I think importantly for this discussion, widespread use of a mechanism like this using provider defined communites without the registration of the community poses similar risks. My take on this is that despite present concerns we've achieved rough consensus to advance this and should proceed accordingly. Thank you all for your efforts, diligent review and sustained discussion that has allowed us to arrive at this point. joel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
