Sriram, I am not agains uRPF at all. I am just saying that i can't imagine many environments that can take benefits from source based RTBH.
Regards On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <[email protected]> wrote: >>I am not sure if anyone would ever deploy such mechanism. >>For contents it's useless as they have to filter DDoSes before they reach >>their network. >>For carriers is poorly scalable as they'd have to configure thousands of >>prefixes. >>It could make sense for eyeballs but they hardly would drop all the traffic >>from their customers even if they're participating in a DDoS >>(also note that inbound customer traffic is rarely an issue for eyeballs) > > Marco, > > Can you please clarify for me the following? > 1. Are your comments directed at uRPF (BCP-84) in general? > 2. If not, are they directed specifically at strict or feasible-path uRPF? > > Once I get clarity into that I think I can better address your concerns. > > Thanks. > Sriram > > -- Marco _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
