On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Job Snijders <j...@ntt.net> wrote: > Dear Warren, > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 06:55:00PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: >> I've just completed my AD review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling. >> >> I only had a few small nits: >> >> Section 3: >> "Involuntary BGP Session Teardown: The Caretaker of the lower layer >> network disrupts BGP control-plane traffic in the upper layer, >> causing the BGP Hold Timers of the affected BGP session to expire," >> -- it took me a few readings to parse this sentence -- I think that >> the "in the upper layer" is redundant and confuses the sentence. >> I think just removing it and >> >> "Involuntary BGP Session Teardown: The Caretaker of the lower layer >> network disrupts (higher layer) BGP control-plane traffic, >> causing the BGP Hold Timers of the affected BGP session to expire,..." ? > > works for me! > >> 2: Section 3.2. Involuntary BGP Session Teardown Recommendations >> "Such culling of control-plane traffic will pre-empt the" - >> s/pre-empt/preempt/ > > Thanks > >> 3: I really like the fact that this has actual exmaple config. I think >> it would be nice it if also included some more vendors. > > Even more?! We already have config for four vendors in the Internet-Draft > itself. :-)
Your counting and my counting differ: A.1. Cisco IOS, IOS XR & Arista EOS Firewall Example Configuration A.2. Nokia SR OS Filter Example Configuration Are you counting IOS and IOS XR as 2 vendors? :-P Anyway, as I said, I really like the examples, and the GH solution WFM. > > There also is a link to > https://github.com/bgp/bgp-session-culling-config-examples which is a > more 'live' version which can be updated as we go. The github repo > currently has 7 platforms, and perhaps over time will grow based on > contributions. > > The configuration example in the Internet-Draft itself mostly serves to > demonstrate the concept in the universal language other than English: > router configs. The example configs are not meant to be an exhaustive > overview. > >> Anyway, I'm fine to start IETF LC like this, but it you are able to >> post a new version I think things might go smoother. >> >> Please let me know either way. > > Sure, I'll bump. > Okey dokey. I'll hit the go button when you do - please poke me if I happen to miss it. W > Kind regards, > > Job -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
