Hi all,
On 10 Oct 2017 5:50 pm, Jay Borkenhagen <j...@braeburn.org> wrote:
Job Snijders writes:
> > The LOCAL_PREF choice here is a simple thing -- don't make it more
> > complicated than it needs to be.
> >
> > Job's suggested text says all that's necessary:
> >
> > "The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the alternative
> > paths. Zero being the lowest value, it MAY be used whichever
> > LOCAL_PREF values are used by the AS."
>
> The above comes from Bruno's hand, I actually proposed the following:
>
> "The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the
> alternative paths. It is RECOMMEND to use 0, the lowest LOCAL_PREF
> value."
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
Sorry for my mis-citing / mis-quoting. Let me try my hand:
The LOCAL_PREF value SHOULD be lower than any of the alternative
paths. The RECOMMENDED value is 0.
That formulation gets my vote. If operators have a good reason to deviate from
the recommendation, they will know that without it being pointed out in the
document.
Thanks.
Jay B.
Cheers,
Ben
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
