Randy Bush wrote on 13/06/2018 16:18:
it strikes me as being a latter day "Go To Statement Considered
Harmful" sort of thing.
goto is harmful!
just like many of the best things in life.
am i supposed to replace
set 666:42
with
remove *:*
add 666:42
like that's not gonna be error prone. and please do not tell me that
the remove *:* leaves a few special well-known communities some
implementor thought should be special snowflakes.
We probably ought to document that Remove means Remove rather than
kinda-remove-bits-here-and-there.
Nick
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
