sounds good to me. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:04 PM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) < kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote:
> Chris, > > >Please send along agenda requests as time permits... We are planning to > meet in Bangkok, unless no one can find agenda topics? :) > > If possible to accommodate, I would like to request 10 to 15 minutes. > > We have this updated WG draft in IDR on route leaks detection and > mitigation. > There is a shift towards using BGP Community (previously it was BGP > Attribute) for carrying > the Route Leak Protection (RLP) information. > The thinking behind this is potentially quicker deployment without > dependence on vendor implementation changes. > It will be good to discuss this in GROW and get operator inputs on the > type of > Community (transitive) that might be best suited (Large, Extended, etc.). > > Updated IDR WG draft: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-10 > > > Authors’ Team Discussion Slides provide helpful graphics and scenario > analyses: > > > https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2018/10/22/rlp_using_bgp_community-v4.pdf > > > Sriram
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
