Once I've issued -01 I'd be comfortable with WGLC. I do want to allow enough time for any other undocumented code points to be added, but that can also happen as part of WGLC.
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, --John On Oct 3, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Susan Hares <sha...@ndzh.com<mailto:sha...@ndzh.com>> wrote: Greetings: The WG has adopted draft-scudder-idr-capabilities-registry-change-02.txt. The authors should submit this as draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-00.txt. Are the authors ready for WG last call on this document? In preparation for a WG LC, the authors should indicate if they know of any IPR regarding the draft. (My apologies for the repeated IPR call but I do not want to miss a process step with this draft. I would like this document go as swiftly as the IDR/Grow WG desires). Susan Hares _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org<mailto:GROW@ietf.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_grow&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=hLt5iDJpw7ukqICc0hoT7A&m=hCL8mraR3kh-svxIYCM_9kBFzPYCUIDtED7QmiPBfIk&s=oC1NtlKpyjHEuzAa_5Vlm2cTWFhBGu-VSQhxDKTJido&e=
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
