Hi Yunan and co-authors of this draft,

First of all as network operator I welcome this extension to BMP to gain 
visibility how and how fast BGP prefixes are being processed through various 
route-policies within a router. Managing BGP route-policing configurations in a 
large and automated cloud/data-center environment with service function 
chaining and L3 MPLS VPN's is challenging without the proper tools.

I am supporting this draft to be adopted by the working group. My input as 
follow: 

In section 2.3 you describe

Policy ID, Policy Distinguisher, Peer ID, VRF/Table name
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace-00#section-2.3

For Network Telemetry closed loop operation this loose definition is not 
sufficient enough. We need the possibility to correlate to BGP device 
configuration to link configuration change to BGP route-policy processing and 
BGP RIB change event. We have with below ongoing drafts already two YANG models 
defining the route-policy attachment points and route-policy definitions. 

Policy configuration overview
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-04#section-2.2

A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy Management
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-06

These fields should be aligned between these drafts so they can be correlated 
at data-processing/data-storage within big data. This is aligned with the input 
I gave on the Network Telemetry Framework draft-song-opsawg-ntf 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/1kuI5xKDTkIa7q5jRKGDq1frFLU

Kind regards
Thomas Graf
____________________________________________________________________________
Network Engineer
Datacenter Functions
Telefon +41-58-223 84 01
Mobile  +41-79-728 80 12
thomas.g...@swisscom.com
____________________________________________________________________________
Swisscom (Schweiz) AG
IT, Network & Infrastructure
Datacenter Functions
Binzring 17
8045 Zürich
www.swisscom.com
Postadresse:
Binzring 17
8045 Zürich


-----Original Message-----
From: GROW <grow-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of oliverxu(??)
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:07 AM
To: internet-dra...@ietf.org; Shunwan Zhuang <zhuangshun...@huawei.com>; Yunan 
Gu <guyu...@huawei.com>; Zhenbin Li <lizhen...@huawei.com>
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] New Version Notification for 
draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace-00.txt(Internet mail)

Dear GROW members,

We have just submitted a new draft that extends BMP to collect the correlated 
BGP route policy and route attributes for route policy validation.

Comments are very welcome!


Oliver.


On [DATE], "[NAME]" <[ADDRESS]> wrote:

    
    A new version of I-D, draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace-00.txt
    has been successfully submitted by Yunan Gu and posted to the
    IETF repository.
    
    Name:               draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace
    Revision:   00
    Title:              BGP Route Policy and Attribute Trace Using BMP
    Document date:      2019-03-09
    Group:              Individual Submission
    Pages:              12
    URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace-00.txt
    Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace/
    Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace-00
    Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xu-grow-bmp-route-policy-attr-trace
    
    
    Abstract:
       The generation of BGP adj-rib-in, local-rib or adj-rib-out comes from
       BGP protocol communication, and route policy processing.  BGP
       Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides the monitoring of BGP adj-rib-in
       [RFC7854], BGP local-rib [I-D.ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib] and BGP adj-
       rib-out [I-D.ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out].  However, there lacks
       monitoring of how BGP routes are transformed from adj-rib-in into
       local-rib and then adj-rib-out (i.e., the BGP route policy processing
       procedures).  This document describes a method of using BMP to trace
       the change of BGP routes in correlation with responsible route
       policies.
    
    
                                                                                
      
    
    
    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    
    The IETF Secretariat
    
    
    

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to