Hi Shunwan, Thanks for your comments, inline:
> On 20 Jul 2019, at 02:52, Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshun...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Regarding VRF/Table Name TLV: > Based on my understanding of RFC7854, I think the processing of VRF/Table > Name TLV can be the same as Type 0 String TLV of BMP Initiation Message in > RFC7854: > The VRF/Table Name TLV MAY be included multiple times. > If multiple strings are included, their ordering MUST be preserved when they > are reported. Thanks for the pointer. > At the same time, this spec can also support processing multiple String > Information into one composite String and then putting it into one TLV. Totally, agree. It’s just probably not worth specifying it as part of the document. Paolo _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
