On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 01:34:17PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: > The authors of draft-francois-grow-bmp-loc-peer asked whether GROW > working group could consider adoption of the internet-draft. > > This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this > internet-draft should be adopted.
I think the work should be adopted. Further comments for the authors on this version: - The address selector is sufficient for ipv4, ipv6, but not ipv6 link-local addresses. - The authors should consider what, if anything, should be done about BGP routes learned from non-BGP live speakers; e.g. APIs or static configuration. - Probably a general comment on the TLV procedures over-all, the error handling for cases of conflicting information from the TLVs needs to be addressed. For example, what if NLRI index 5 is present both in a group and individually and conflicting state is expressed. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
