Apologies, I’ve not been tracking, but I’m confused. 

How is this "document replaces RFC7454 / BCP194?”

One of the biggest risk on the Internet today is operator’s ignoring RFC7454 / 
BCP194. 

https://dashboard.shadowserver.org/statistics/combined/tree/?day=2023-06-28&source=population&source=population6&tag=bgp&geo=all&data_set=count&scale=log

> On Apr 9, 2025, at 7:49 AM, Tobias Fiebig <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Moin,
> 
> with the two E-Ds being adopted, I now pushed a version of the document
> referencing those.
> 
> How shall we proceed now?
> 
> With best regards,
> Tobias
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:48 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-grow-bgpopsecupd-06.txt is now available.
>> It is a
>> work item of the Global Routing Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF.
>> 
>>    Title:   Updated BGP Operations and Security
>>    Authors: Tobias Fiebig
>>             Nick Hilliard
>>    Name:    draft-ietf-grow-bgpopsecupd-06.txt
>>    Pages:   8
>>    Dates:   2025-04-09
>> 
>> Abstract:
>> 
>>    The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is a critical component in the
>>    Internet to exchange routing information between network domains.
>>    Due to this central nature, it is important to understand the
>>    security and reliability requirements that can and should be
>> ensured
>>    to prevent accidental or intentional routing disturbances.
>> 
>>    Previously, security considerations for BGP have been described in
>>    RFC7454 / BCP194.  Since the publications of RFC7454 / BCP194,
>>    several developments and changes in operational practice took
>> place
>>    that warrant an update of these best current practices.  This
>>    document replaces RFC7454 / BCP194, focusing on the overall goals,
>>    and providing a less implementation centric set of best practices.
>> 
>>    To this end, the document describes the security requirements and
>>    goals when operating BGP for exchanging routing information with
>>    other networks.  The document explicitly does not focus on
>> specific
>>    technical implementations and requirements.  Operators are advised
>> to
>>    consult documentation and contemporary informational documents
>>    concerning methods to ensure that these properties are
>> sufficiently
>>    ensured in their network.
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgpopsecupd/
>> 
>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-grow-bgpopsecupd-06.html
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-grow-bgpopsecupd-06
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
> -- 
> Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
> T +31 616 80 98 99
> M [email protected]
> Pronouns: he/him/his
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to