Tommy Jensen has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have no objections to this document. Two nits follow: >From Sections 7.3 and 8.3: > {"object": "route: 2001:db8::/32\norigin: AS64500\nsource: EXAMPLE"} Per Section 3 of RFC 4012, the class for IPv6 routes is route6, not route. >From Section 6.3: > If the snapshot or delta file was compressed with GZIP, the > filename MUST end in ".gz", and the hash MUST match the compressed > data. Why not use Content-Encoding or Content-Type headers instead? I assume there's a reason, and I would suggest a quick note of it here as relying on file extensions feels odd and fragile (+1 to Andy's callout). _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
