[cc: rtgwg, grow] It occurs to me that rtgwg and grow may not know that they care about this draft. For context, IPv6 linklocal peering are useful for building BGP fabrics (a topic rtgwg is overlapping) and for ISP inter-AS links.
However, while the features are regularly in use, there are small interop issues that this draft addresses. IDR could use your scrutiny on this document. Please review and supply feedback or even "looks good to me!". Thanks. -- Jeff ----- Forwarded message from "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <[email protected]> ----- Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 06:30:45 +0000 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> CC: idr-chairs <[email protected]> Subject: WG last call and IPR call for draft-ietf-idr-linklocal-capability (May 13, 2026 to May 27, 2026) This begins a 2-week working group last call for draft-ietf-idr-linklocal-capability-04. This WG last call ends on May 27th, 2026. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-linklocal-capability Please review and provide feedbacks to this last call with an indication of "Support" or "Not Support". For "Not support", it is appreciated to also give explanations and suggestions to resolve them. For the purposes of the shepherd's report and according to IETF BCP 78/79, the authors are requested to declare whether they are aware of any undisclosed IPR covering this draft. Members of the working group are similarly obligated to report any IPR they are aware of as well. Best regards, Jie (as WG secretary & document shepherd) ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
