Hi, We've completed the reference updates for the registrations in RFC 9972, but we had two questions/comments:
1) What should we do about the remaining early allocations for stat types 24 and 25? 24 Number of routes currently in per-AFI/SAFI selected as primary route. (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-10-18, extension registered 2025-09-23, expires 2026-10-18) [draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-16] 25 Number of routes currently in per-AFI/SAFI selected as a backup route. (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-10-18, extension registered 2025-09-23, expires 2026-10-18) [draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-16] Previously, we were instructed to keep these two early allocations with a reference to draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-16, with the expectation that they were going to be moved to a different document (draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv). 2) It looks like in the html version of RFC 9972 the character encodings of the hyphens in the term "Adj-RIB-In" (and "Adj-RIB-Out") differs from the txt version (for all but one instance each, not counting a reference link). We've listed in the registry the character from the txt version (U+002D hyphen-minus). Please let us know if we need to correct this. txt: Adj-RIB-In Adj-RIB-Out (U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS) html: Adj‑RIB‑In Adj‑RIB‑Out (U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN) Thanks! Best regards, David Dong IANA Services Sr. Specialist On Tue May 19 22:37:03 2026, [email protected] wrote: > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 9972 > > Title: Advanced BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) > Statistics Types > Author: M. Srivastava, Ed., > Y. Liu, > C. Lin, Ed., > J. Li > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: May 2026 > Mailbox: [email protected], > [email protected], > [email protected], > [email protected] > Pages: 15 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-17.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9972 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC9972 > > The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) described in RFC 7854 defines > statistics message types to observe events that occur on a monitored > router. This document defines new statistics types to monitor BMP > Adj-RIB-In and Adj-RIB-Out Routing Information Bases (RIBs). > > This document is a product of the Global Routing Operations Working > Group of the IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and > suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) > for the > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of > this > memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected]. > Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
