On Thursday, July 7, 2011 1:33:09 PM UTC-5, Rudy Richter wrote: > > That said, we're not opposed to new developers working on Growl. In > fact, if you're skilled or looking to cut your teeth on an established > codebase we'd like to hear from you on the growl development list. > We're pretty solidly along on the tasks for getting Growl into the > MAS, but after we submit we've got a laundry list of modernization, > code reduction and a complete UI overhaul on the configuration side of > things planned. By putting Growl in the MacAppStore and reducing the > dearth of crufty (there are still 10.3 references) legacy code the app > as a whole will be much easier to maintain, work on, and allow us to > add a whole bunch of really useful user facing features to Growl. > > -rudy >
I appreciate that. I'm relatively new to ObjectiveC. I've built a couple of iPhone apps for personal use that make heavy use of Apple Push Notification Service, and I know that I don't have a real good grasp for how to use the language constructs well, nor do I understand many of the frameworks. So I don't know that I'd be a good candidate for working on such a well established code base. But I will keep this in mind, it is my style of application to work on. (communication / backend tool centric) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/growldiscuss/-/Ykxc1DBm1FkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
