Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed that your patch isn't adding ntfs to the utils (grub-probe, etc). > > I'm attaching a fix for that. ChangeLog entries: > > * conf/powerpc-ieee1275.rmk: Add fs/ntfs.c to grub-probe and grub-emu. > > * conf/i386-efi.rmk: Likewise. Also remove unused grub-setup definition. > > * conf/i386-pc.rmk: Add fs/ntfs.c to grub-probe, grub-emu and > grub-setup. > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0800, Bean wrote: >> Ok, I reformat the patch, hopefully it will conform to standard. > > I think what Marco meant is a multipart/mixed attachment (like the one I'm > sending now). This is what most mail programs do when you attach a text file > (but not a gzipped one!).
Actually, what he did was just fine :-). > The good thing about this method, is that you can easily extract a patch > (without copy-pasting or being exposed to unwanted format conversions), but > the patch is still part of the message so you can reply to it to discuss > specific parts, keeping their context. If it is an inline attachment or of the patch is inline in the email doesn't matter much to me. I personally like it how Bean sent it :). -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
