On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:36:17AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >I myself have no objection. I'd prefer svn, but that's not supported by > >Savannah yet, and anything is better than CVS IMO. In the event that we > >decide to migrate to svn in the future, though, is there an easy path > >from git to svn? > > I believe git-svn (included with git) should be able to do it. I'm > quite sure it would work fine for linear history, but things may be > trickier if branches are used. > > However, I think nobody would want to go from git to svn. Alone the > ability to work on more than one patch at once is like getting an > extra dimension, something that very few would want to give up.
Just to make myself clear, I didn't mean to argue that we'll want to migrate from git to svn (I have yet to build an opinion of git myself). However, I think it's very important that we have the option to do it in case we want to. Being trapped somewhere you're not fond of is, like, bad thing you know :-) -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
