On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Pavel Roskin<pro...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:18 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> There is strictly no need to do this restructuration. The real bug is >> different fix would be setting dev->disk->partition to 0 before >> calling grub_disk_read and restoring it afterwards. This part of code >> is changed anyway with my nested partition patch and I was hoping it >> could be applied quickly. Could you test nestpart branch of my >> repository? > > I'm not comfortable to approve a 60k long patch that reorganizes the > code and fixed numerous bugs in the same time. I'm sure bugs can be > fixed separately. > It fixed bugs because it replaced some parts of code with new constructions. So basically wht you ask is to do some work and then abandon, it additionally spending time rediffing patches. Similar thing happens when you ask to split patches but then all split go in without any discussion. Sorry, but this is just useless work > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel